Aquaculture Biotechnology 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470963159.ch21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential Ecological and Genetic Impacts of Aquaculture Biotechnologies: Eco‐Evolutionary Considerations for Managing the Blue Revolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the decreased growth of transgenic relative to wild-type juveniles was probably owing to their higher metabolic demands [44] in combination with limited food availability and warm water temperatures (mean 16.9 + 2.58C during the experiment). Regardless of the mechanism, our observations of reduced growth of transgenic salmon in stream mesocosms but increased growth in hatchery-like conditions contribute to evidence suggesting a complex, dynamic interplay between transgenic growth potential and the environment [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the decreased growth of transgenic relative to wild-type juveniles was probably owing to their higher metabolic demands [44] in combination with limited food availability and warm water temperatures (mean 16.9 + 2.58C during the experiment). Regardless of the mechanism, our observations of reduced growth of transgenic salmon in stream mesocosms but increased growth in hatchery-like conditions contribute to evidence suggesting a complex, dynamic interplay between transgenic growth potential and the environment [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The gene construct used was a chimeric GH construct (opAFP-GHc2; EO-1a line) that has been shown to greatly enhance growth [21], reduce reproductive performance among precocious mature males [22] and increase risk-taking foraging behaviours [23,24] in transgenic individuals. However, such phenotypic changes are known to be heavily influenced by gene-environment interactions [25,26]. The wild populations used in our experimental crosses were numerically large with no indications of inbreeding depression or low heterozygosity, and unaffected by the potentially confounding influences of domestication selection for growth [27].…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Experimental Fishesmentioning
confidence: 99%