2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential for gene flow from exotic eucalypt plantations into Australia's rare native eucalypts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed heterozygosity (individual heterozygosity), however, was consistently higher in the breeding population than in native trees, suggesting that heterozygotes have been preferentially selected within the program . Markers have been successfully used to estimate outcrossing rates, study parentage, and outside pollen contamination in seed orchards, parameters that have also been valuable to provide general guidelines for risk assessment of gene flow from plantation to natural stands (Barbour et al 2010;Burczyk et al 2002;Chaix et al 2003;Gaiotto et al 1997;Jones et al 2008;Patterson et al 2004;Rao et al 2008). In breeding programs, DNA paternity testing was successfully employed to retrospectively select parents of higher specific combining ability and demonstrate realized gains in volume growth above 24% in commercial forest stands (Grattapaglia et al 2004b).…”
Section: Molecular Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed heterozygosity (individual heterozygosity), however, was consistently higher in the breeding population than in native trees, suggesting that heterozygotes have been preferentially selected within the program . Markers have been successfully used to estimate outcrossing rates, study parentage, and outside pollen contamination in seed orchards, parameters that have also been valuable to provide general guidelines for risk assessment of gene flow from plantation to natural stands (Barbour et al 2010;Burczyk et al 2002;Chaix et al 2003;Gaiotto et al 1997;Jones et al 2008;Patterson et al 2004;Rao et al 2008). In breeding programs, DNA paternity testing was successfully employed to retrospectively select parents of higher specific combining ability and demonstrate realized gains in volume growth above 24% in commercial forest stands (Grattapaglia et al 2004b).…”
Section: Molecular Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F 1 hybrid seedlings are, therefore, generally detectable through visual inspection of open pollinated progeny grown from seed collected from the native trees, whether this be following supplementary (Barbour et al 2005a) or natural (Barbour et al 2002) crossing. This methodology is very efficient and has been validated using: (i) controlled crossing (where flowers were emasculated and isolated - Barbour et al 2005a); (ii) molecular markers (Barbour et al 2002;Barbour et al 2010); and (iii) near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (Humphreys et al 2008;O'Reilly-Wapstra et al 2013). The morphological differences between exotic F 1 hybrids and the native species at the seedling stage have been documented to facilitate operational risk assessments (Barbour et al 2005a;Roberts et al 2009).…”
Section: The Case Of Eucalyptus Nitens In Tasmaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar plantation buffer distance is now being tested in what was predicted to be one of the highest risk situations in Tasmania. This case study will be used to inform an adaptive management strategy associated with the development of a E. nitens plantation estate of nearly 600 ha in the landscape surrounding a small reserve of one of the three populations of E. perriniana in Tasmania (Barbour et al 2010;Larcombe et al 2012). At the beginning, a small plantation of 60 ha of E. nitens was situated 630 m away from the E. perriniana population, but subsequent plantings were done up to a 500 m buffer distance around the E. perriniana population.…”
Section: The Case Of Eucalyptus Nitens In Tasmaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Afforestation and reforestation programmes are among the largest sources of genetic contamination of local populations when there are weak barriers to intra-or interspecific gene flow between introduced and local individuals (Barbour et al, 2010;Meirmans et al, 2010;DiFazio et al, 2012). In such programmes, hundreds of hectares are often planted with very few species at a high density, and thus the introduced trees are sources of a huge amount of pollen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%