2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of feeding patterns to assess generic welfare in growing-finishing pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feed intake rate can be interpreted as voracious eating [21]. Voracious eating increases over time since body size and oral capacity become larger, which allows pigs to take larger bites and eat more feed in a shorter time [6], as observed in the current study. Although changes in feed intake rate were observed in EP1 among periods of the day, no differences were detected during EP2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Feed intake rate can be interpreted as voracious eating [21]. Voracious eating increases over time since body size and oral capacity become larger, which allows pigs to take larger bites and eat more feed in a shorter time [6], as observed in the current study. Although changes in feed intake rate were observed in EP1 among periods of the day, no differences were detected during EP2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Considering that a light-off event would be expected to lower the feed intake (positively correlated with voracious eating, [27]), the opposite behavior observed herein might be understood as a feeding motivation for pigs to try to compensate for the HS diurnal impact. In other words, the light-off event may have triggered some competition for feeder access, since group-housed pigs in restricted conditions increase voracity as a mechanism to maintain meal size levels [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different studies support a relationship between animal welfare and growth performance. In pigs, feeding patterns may be used as welfare indicators, and different stressors have been shown to impact growth performance (Martínez-Miró et al 2016;Bus et al 2021). Furthermore, a recent study showed that intramuscular vaccination was associated with lethargy and decreased feed intake after weaning, compared to intradermal vaccination, resulting in decreased growth performance during the nursery period (Bruna Ferrandin et al 2022).…”
Section: Clinical Safety Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the main contribution to the maintenance concept is that it brings information at the individual level, which makes it an interesting and applicable tool for fields in which it is especially valuable to pay attention to the individuality of animals, such as in the assessment of the welfare of growing–finishing pigs. In fact, Bus et al [ 28 ] observed that reduced welfare is associated with deviations in FBHs. However, those authors reported that a large variability in FBHs among individuals exists and should be well understood before the variation that represents pig welfare can be interpreted, a case in which the use of the maintenance approach is of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%