2015
DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of learning from erroneous models: comparing three types of model instruction

Abstract: Learning from computer models is a promising approach to learning. This study investigated how three types of learning from computer models can be applied to teach high-school students (aged 14-17) about the process of glucose-insulin regulation. Two traditional forms of learning from models (i.e. simulating a predefined model and constructing a model) were compared to learning from an erroneous model. In this innovative form of learning from computer models, students are provided with a model that contained e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…found that participants described personalized care as a critical factor that shaped their positive prenatal care experiences (36). Finally, the model could be adapted to become a teaching tool for health professionals that care for patients experiencing diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that participants described personalized care as a critical factor that shaped their positive prenatal care experiences (36). Finally, the model could be adapted to become a teaching tool for health professionals that care for patients experiencing diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various strategies support this idea of model progression. These include strategies such as learners exploring a full working model [prior exploration ], receiving support in the form of a partial model which outlined the basic structure of a system [partially worked-out models (Mulder et al 2016)], and learners working with a model which contained errors [learning from erroneous models (Wijnen et al 2015)].…”
Section: Model Progression Of Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wijnen et al . () have conducted experiments concerning learning from erroneous models. Particular attention has been devoted to the so‐called stock‐and‐flow error, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%