2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of REDD+ for carbon sequestration in tropical forests: Supply curves for carbon storage for Kalimantan, Indonesia

Abstract: Abstract:We study the potential of tropical multi-age multi-species forests for sequestering carbon in response to financial incentives from REDD+. The use of reduced impact logging techniques (RIL) allows a forest owner to apply for carbon credits whereas the use of conventional logging techniques (CL) does not. This paper is the first to develop a Hartman model with selective cutting in this setting that takes additionality of carbon sequestration explicitly into account. We apply the model using data for Ka… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this scenario, we assume that all damaged trees decay sufficiently fast such that they do not affect growth of the remaining stand, irrespective of their physical condition: injured but still alive (e.g., because of a bark or crown injury) or dead (e.g., because of a broken trunk). This is a common assumption in the literature on the optimal management of multiage forests (e.g., Boscolo & Vincent, , ; Boscolo et al, ; Indrajaya et al, ; Tahvonen, ). As a result, as in Scenario A , no trees need to be moved from healthy to injured species varieties so, ΓBs=Ibold-italicnm×bold-italicnmand oBij=oij.Comparing the results of this scenario with those of Scenario A allows us to disentangle the effects of differences in costs and the effects of differences in damages between CL and RIL on various variables.…”
Section: Study Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this scenario, we assume that all damaged trees decay sufficiently fast such that they do not affect growth of the remaining stand, irrespective of their physical condition: injured but still alive (e.g., because of a bark or crown injury) or dead (e.g., because of a broken trunk). This is a common assumption in the literature on the optimal management of multiage forests (e.g., Boscolo & Vincent, , ; Boscolo et al, ; Indrajaya et al, ; Tahvonen, ). As a result, as in Scenario A , no trees need to be moved from healthy to injured species varieties so, ΓBs=Ibold-italicnm×bold-italicnmand oBij=oij.Comparing the results of this scenario with those of Scenario A allows us to disentangle the effects of differences in costs and the effects of differences in damages between CL and RIL on various variables.…”
Section: Study Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For Scenario B, we follow Macpherson, Schulze, Carter, and Vidal () and Indrajaya et al () and assume that harvest intensity and stand composition affect damages in the following way: dBsT=(ijhijT)DsyT,where Ds is an mn×mn damage matrix, the diagonal of which contains the logging damage coefficients under logging practice normals (damage coefficients are lower for RIL than for CL). The damage coefficients represent the proportion of trees damaged, per tree harvested, within each species group i and diameter class j.…”
Section: Study Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data yang diperlukan dalam maksimasi keuntungan di hutan alam ini antara lain: data pertumbuhan volume kayu, asumsi kerusakan tegakan tinggal, dan data ekonomi (meliputi seluruh biaya dan pendapatan dalam pengusahaan hutan alam). Model maksimasi keuntungan dengan formula Faustmann pada rejim tebang pilih di hutan alam di Indonesia mengikuti Indrajaya, van der Werf, van Ierland, Mohren, and Weikard (2016).…”
Section: Model Faustmann Dalam Sistem Tebang Pilih DI Hutan Alam Modeunclassified