2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-019-00154-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of species distribution modelling for reintroduction projects: the case study of the Chequered Skipper in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been largely used to understand species' vulnerability to climate change, a key step in developing effective biodiversity conservation plans, and less frequently, to identify and implement management options, like translocation planning (Foden et al., 2019), and detect the role of climate change in translocations failure (Bellis et al., 2020). So far, SDMs have been used to select suitable sites for reintroduction of single species (Adhikari et al., 2012; Wilson et al, 2011), to identify potential source populations for translocation (Maes et al., 2019) and to predict range expansion after translocation (Smeraldo et al., 2017). SDMs have been used in combination with the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria and related metrics for incorporating the impact of climate change on species extinction risk (Attorre et al., 2018) and other conservation purposes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been largely used to understand species' vulnerability to climate change, a key step in developing effective biodiversity conservation plans, and less frequently, to identify and implement management options, like translocation planning (Foden et al., 2019), and detect the role of climate change in translocations failure (Bellis et al., 2020). So far, SDMs have been used to select suitable sites for reintroduction of single species (Adhikari et al., 2012; Wilson et al, 2011), to identify potential source populations for translocation (Maes et al., 2019) and to predict range expansion after translocation (Smeraldo et al., 2017). SDMs have been used in combination with the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria and related metrics for incorporating the impact of climate change on species extinction risk (Attorre et al., 2018) and other conservation purposes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are pit-falls associated with SDMs, such as the potential for disequilibrium between range and niche due to dispersal limitations and biotic interactions (Svenning & Sandel 2013). Furthermore, examples of translocation projects explicitly outlining the use of SDMs to guide management decisions are scarce (Guisan et al 2013) (but see Brooker et al [2018] and Maes et al [2019]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the base maps to further identify conservation priorities. Another advantage of this research is that it also enables us to obtain a better understanding of potential refugia for certain species under climate change, which would be extremely useful when ex situ rescue or population reintroductions must be implemented [ 108 , 109 , 110 ]. Areas of high endemism should also be a future priority; the commonly applied parsimony analysis of endemicity affiliated with GIS could provide such vital information for conservation planning [ 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 ].…”
Section: Recommendations Of Future Butterfly Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%