2020
DOI: 10.15835/nbha48111756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential sensitivity to climate change of selected endangered and important Natura 2000 Habitats and plants from Bucegi Natural Park, Romania

Abstract: This study was carried out in the Bucegi Natural Park, a protected area of the Romanian Carpathians. It aims at documenting the potential sensitivity of six widespread Natura 2000 habitat types and of all plants with conservative value (200 taxa) in the mountain area, to the changes in temperature and humidity, predicted for this century. Regional expert knowledge and environmental indicator values were considered in assessing the potential habitat’s sensitivity. The results support the evidence that sensitivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to a considerable decline in its distribution, it is currently considered to be critically endangered in Greece (small population found by Tsiftsis and Antonopoulos, 2011), vulnerable in Great Britain (Cheffings and Farrell, 2005) and Bulgaria (Petrova and Vladimirov, 2009), endangered in Ireland (Curtis and McGough, 1988), Czech Republic (Holub and Procházka, 2000), Germany (Ludwig and Schnittler, 1996), and Sweden (Gärdenfors, 2010), and near threatened in Norway (Artsdatabanken, 2010) and Poland (Kaźmierczakowa et al, 2016). It is also protected in many European countries (Reinhammar et al, 2002;Bilz et al, 2011), e.g., Poland (Kaźmierczakowa et al, 2016, Czech Republic (Danihelka et al, 2012), Denmark (Damgaard et al, 2020), Romania (Sârbu et al, 2020), Ukraine (Kricsfalusy et al, 1999(Kricsfalusy et al, , 2010, Slovakia (Turis et al, 2014), Norway (subordinate agency, 2022), Sweden (Naturva˚rdsverket, 2022), Austria (Zulka et al, 2001;Jersáková et al, 2011), Germany (Jersáková et al, 2011), Switzerland (Jersáková et al, 2011), and Italy (Jersáková et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to a considerable decline in its distribution, it is currently considered to be critically endangered in Greece (small population found by Tsiftsis and Antonopoulos, 2011), vulnerable in Great Britain (Cheffings and Farrell, 2005) and Bulgaria (Petrova and Vladimirov, 2009), endangered in Ireland (Curtis and McGough, 1988), Czech Republic (Holub and Procházka, 2000), Germany (Ludwig and Schnittler, 1996), and Sweden (Gärdenfors, 2010), and near threatened in Norway (Artsdatabanken, 2010) and Poland (Kaźmierczakowa et al, 2016). It is also protected in many European countries (Reinhammar et al, 2002;Bilz et al, 2011), e.g., Poland (Kaźmierczakowa et al, 2016, Czech Republic (Danihelka et al, 2012), Denmark (Damgaard et al, 2020), Romania (Sârbu et al, 2020), Ukraine (Kricsfalusy et al, 1999(Kricsfalusy et al, , 2010, Slovakia (Turis et al, 2014), Norway (subordinate agency, 2022), Sweden (Naturva˚rdsverket, 2022), Austria (Zulka et al, 2001;Jersáková et al, 2011), Germany (Jersáková et al, 2011), Switzerland (Jersáková et al, 2011), and Italy (Jersáková et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a research gap remains regarding the specific ecological impact of intensified sheep grazing on these alpine grasslands in the study area. Recent studies have shown that grasslands on steep slopes possess significant biodiversity value [38,39], making it imperative to investigate the effects of intensified sheep grazing on these grasslands [31]. Understanding the ecological consequences of this grazing practice will help identify potential conservation measures and management strategies to maintain the biodiversity and cultural significance of alpine grassland in the study area [40,41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%