2019
DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2019.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential utility of real-time PCR of the 16S-rRNA gene in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis

Abstract: The potential utility of real-time PCR of the 16S-rRNA gene in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Turk J Pediatr 2019; 61: 493-499. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the 16S rRNA gene in diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and compare it with conventional blood culture. A total of 150 infants were enrolled in this prospective study. The infants were classified into two groups: sepsis group (n=100) and control group (n=50). Blood samples for complete … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to determine the use of this molecular tool in the diagnosis of meningitis has also been made, although the clinical relevance remains ambiguous due to very small sample sizes in these studies [ 19 , 29 ]. In the same way, other researchers have looked into its clinical importance in blood and urine samples in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Most of these studies have demonstrated important clinical worth of 16S rRNA sequencing in the diagnosis of particular infections in children, albeit there are differences in the diagnostic yield across these studies brought about by factors such as specimen types and differing institutional practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts to determine the use of this molecular tool in the diagnosis of meningitis has also been made, although the clinical relevance remains ambiguous due to very small sample sizes in these studies [ 19 , 29 ]. In the same way, other researchers have looked into its clinical importance in blood and urine samples in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Most of these studies have demonstrated important clinical worth of 16S rRNA sequencing in the diagnosis of particular infections in children, albeit there are differences in the diagnostic yield across these studies brought about by factors such as specimen types and differing institutional practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is a paucity of data on the clinical utility of 16S rRNA sequencing in pediatric infections [ 2 , 6 ]. Few studies highlight the diagnostic utility of 16S rRNA sequencing in select pediatric infections [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Most of these studies have attempted to isolate its clinical usefulness in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear how well this test performs at detecting polymicrobial infections, but the overall diagnostic potential is hampered by its very poor sensitivity (29-47%) [82,83]. Istanbullu et al evaluated the performance of 16S rRNA gene qPCR using hydrolysis probes for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, and reported sensitivity and specificity of 16.6% and 97.8%, respectively [84]. However, it is important to note that many of these PCR tests have high negative predictive values (up to 95%), suggesting they would be more appropriate as screening tools to exclude infections, predict patient outcomes and monitor therapy rather than to identify pathogens [84,85].…”
Section: Pcr On Whole Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon title and abstract review, 1368 studies were excluded, and 119 were subjected to full-text review. Of these, 100 were excluded because valid data could not be extracted, and the remaining 19 articles were included in our study [12,13,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies used a prospective study design to avoid inappropriate exclusion (Figure 2). Five studies did not specify whether patients were continuously enrolled or not [25,26,[28][29][30]. The remaining studies specified continuous enrollment.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%