The potentiometric titration of aminophylline and aminophylline-phenobarbital mixtures

Bartilucci, Andrew J.; Discher, Clarence A.

doi:10.1002/jps.3030391113

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

References1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1950

1982

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Griffenhagen and Brady (4), Bhattacharya and Banerjee (5), and David (6) proposed argentiometric and gravimetric procedures for aminophylline and phenobarbital combinations. Bartilucci and Discher (7) determined the active ingredients b y differential titrimetry in either water or alcohol.…”

Section: Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Absorbancy Ratios to the Analysis of Pharmaceuticals III

Yokoyama¹,

Pernarowski²

1961

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Absorbancy Ratios to the Analysis of Pharmaceuticals III

Yokoyama¹,

Pernarowski²

1961

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The estimation of aminophylline by potentiometric titration has been found to produce results which compare favorably with the U.S.P. method (10). Some modifications of the U.S.P.…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

Pharmaceuticals and Natural Drugs

Marsh¹,

Hilty²

1952

Anal. Chem.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AS IS the case in all the major fields of the science, the litera-_ \_ ture pertaining to analytical chemistry is rapidly approaching a state of practical unwieldiness. One might say-and not too facetiously-that a detailed search of published information for an analytical project in applied analysis could conceivably involve a large proportion of the time devoted to the project itself. The number of annual published contributions to analytical studies of pharmaceutical and natural drugs alone is estimated to be nearly a thousand.The preparation of a review covering such a number and diversity of publications necessarily poses several problems. Foremost among these is the matter of selection of material, since it is obvious that an abstract of the contents of each article could not be included. The authors wish to repeat and to re-emphasize the fact that omissions from the review do not imply that the papers so omitted do not contain useful information. A conscious effort has been made, however, to include those studies and procedures which offer the greatest possibilities for use in pharmaceutical analysis.The classification of methods is the same as that published in the previous annual reviews of pharmaceuticals and natural drugs.

show abstract