2017
DOI: 10.20429/nyarj.2017.020208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Poverty Simulation: Increasing Teacher Sensitivity for Students Living in Poverty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose to use the adapted version of the CAPS assessment tool by Goelman et al 27 These researchers made minor adaptations to the assessment survey included with the CAPS 2008 kit which was not available with ours. We chose to use this adapted version because the five‐items ask participants to rate their understanding of various aspects of living in poverty on a 5‐point Likert scale (1 = No understanding; 5 = Almost complete understanding) and allowed us to measure the QSEN knowledge domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to use the adapted version of the CAPS assessment tool by Goelman et al 27 These researchers made minor adaptations to the assessment survey included with the CAPS 2008 kit which was not available with ours. We chose to use this adapted version because the five‐items ask participants to rate their understanding of various aspects of living in poverty on a 5‐point Likert scale (1 = No understanding; 5 = Almost complete understanding) and allowed us to measure the QSEN knowledge domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central feature of the intervention is an immersive group experience where up to 80 participants take on roles of people living in poverty and try to “make ends meet” for the duration of a simulated month. The effectiveness of CAPS has been investigated by researchers in a range of fields, and has been shown to improve attitudes, increase awareness, and foster empathy for people living in poverty among samples of students (Engler et al., 2020; Steck et al., 2011; M. Todd et al., 2011), nurses (Ehmke & Sanner‐Stiehr, 2021; Yang et al., 2014), teachers (Goelman Rice et al., 2017), dentists (Lampiris et al., 2017), pharmacists (Clarke et al., 2016), and social service workers (Engler et al., 2020).…”
Section: The Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have also been conducted with students from more than one discipline, either undergraduates (Cox et al, 2012;Kelty et al, 2020;Kuehn et al, 2020;Vandsburger et al, 2010), graduate students (Ehmke & Sanner-Stiehr, 2020), or mixed undergraduate and graduate students (Hitchcock et al, 2021;Marrast et al, 2022;Strasser et al, 2013). Additional research on the effects of the Poverty Simulation has been completed with educational professionals (Engler et al, 2019;Goelman-Rice et al, 2017), healthcare workers (Murray et al, 2022), and business and community members (Nickols & Nielsen, 2011;Pankow, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%