2013
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Power of Meta-Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Abstract: Meta-analysis of multiple genome-wide association (GWA) studies has become common practice over the last few years. The main advantage of this technique is the maximization of power to detect the subtle genetic effects for common traits. Moreover, one can use meta-analysis to probe and identify heterogeneity in the effect sizes across the combined studies. In this review we systematically appraised and evaluated the characteristics of GWA meta-analyses with 10,000 or more subjects published until June 2012. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
2
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has transformed the reliability of genetic research, with fewer but more robust genetic signals now being identified [59]. The successful transformation has required international collaboration, the combination of data in large consortia, and the adoption of rigorous replication practices in meta-analysis within consortia [60, 61]. …”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Publication and Other Reporting Biasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has transformed the reliability of genetic research, with fewer but more robust genetic signals now being identified [59]. The successful transformation has required international collaboration, the combination of data in large consortia, and the adoption of rigorous replication practices in meta-analysis within consortia [60, 61]. …”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Publication and Other Reporting Biasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These consortia-based genetic association studies aggregate GWAS data from individual studies in order to address the need to increase sample size and improve power to detect significant associations. Consortia-based genetic association studies often use meta-analyses and report summary data submitted across studies or analyze raw data from multiple GWASs (Panagiotou et al, 2013). …”
Section: Genetic Association Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of relationship was previously described for height, lipid levels and blood pressure as examples, showing a linear or more rapid increase in “hits” above the inflection point. (4) The likely explanation is that the genetic contributions to these traits are predominantly polygenic, with each associated SNP making a small additive contribution to risk. Below the inflection point, samples are underpowered to reliably detect even the strongest (individually small) common SNP effects; above the inflection point, numerous weaker effects are detected in a more or less linear fashion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%