2014
DOI: 10.2501/jar-54-1-071-080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Power of Social Television: Can Social Media Build Viewer Engagement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…EEG's high temporal resolution and ability to measure surface cortical electrical activity of submilliseconds indicates that EEG, rather than fMRI, is more useful for measuring neural responses of dynamic messages in TV commercials (Ohme & Matukin, 2012;Ohme et al, 2009). Currently, EEG is frequently used in advertising research to measure consumer responses to emotional engagement (Ohme & Matukin, 2012), personal relevance (Pynta et al, 2014), cognitive attention (Gountas, Ciorciari, Gountas, & Huddle, 2014;Rothschild et al, 1986;Vecchiato et al, 2010), facial recognition (Gountas et al, 2014), prediction of success (Boksem & Smidts, 2015), and brand choice evaluation to predict future choices (Telpaz, Webb, & Levy, 2015). Table 2 presents a summary of advertising research using EEG research methodology.…”
Section: Electroencephalography In Advertising Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG's high temporal resolution and ability to measure surface cortical electrical activity of submilliseconds indicates that EEG, rather than fMRI, is more useful for measuring neural responses of dynamic messages in TV commercials (Ohme & Matukin, 2012;Ohme et al, 2009). Currently, EEG is frequently used in advertising research to measure consumer responses to emotional engagement (Ohme & Matukin, 2012), personal relevance (Pynta et al, 2014), cognitive attention (Gountas, Ciorciari, Gountas, & Huddle, 2014;Rothschild et al, 1986;Vecchiato et al, 2010), facial recognition (Gountas et al, 2014), prediction of success (Boksem & Smidts, 2015), and brand choice evaluation to predict future choices (Telpaz, Webb, & Levy, 2015). Table 2 presents a summary of advertising research using EEG research methodology.…”
Section: Electroencephalography In Advertising Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such context was studied by Pynta et al . (), who focused on second‐screen usage (sharing viewing between the television and internet‐enabled devices), finding that such usage ‘can significantly enhance neural indicators of viewer engagement in the television program.’ (Pynta et al . , p. 71).…”
Section: Neuroscientific Studies Of Decision‐making Within a Marketinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), who focused on second‐screen usage (sharing viewing between the television and internet‐enabled devices), finding that such usage ‘can significantly enhance neural indicators of viewer engagement in the television program.’ (Pynta et al . , p. 71). Neural activity was innovatively measured by a custom‐designed electrode cap and a steady‐state topography (SST) methodology, which continuously tracks rapid changes in brain function.…”
Section: Neuroscientific Studies Of Decision‐making Within a Marketinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been research on the use of neural measures of engagement (Pynta et al, 2014;Stelle et al, 2013), most engagement metrics to date have used a fixed set of items that assumed all products or brands could be assessed using the same set of scale items (Brakus, Schmitt, and Zarantonello, 2009;Hollebeek, Glynn, and Brodie, 2014). The primary objective of this type of approach has been to develop a single measurement scale that is valid, reliable, and generalizable across multiple contexts.…”
Section: Measuring Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%