The power struggle: exploring the reality of clinical reasoning

Abstract

Purpose: Historically, clinical reasoning has largely been considered from an empirical, biomedical standpoint. This epistemology, rooted in imperial rule, is influential in how healthcare practitioners practice. An empirical approach to healthcare often oversimplifies the complex nature of clinical reasoning by obscuring the influence of imperial ideologies on decision-making. This can perpetuate inequitable approaches to healthcare delivery which deepen social, political and economic divides globally. This paper aims to explore and challenge this standpoint by exploring how power, imperialism and performativity influences healthcare provision and decision-making amongst healthcare practitioners in dysphagia rehabilitation. Methods: Qualitative exploratory interviews were undertaken with seven South African trained SLPs with experience working in dysphagia. To allow for participation and collaboration from participants, three data collection tools were employed within the interviews: oral histories, cognitive mapping and arts-based tasks. An initial modified thematic analysis followed by a further ideological analysis were undertaken to analyse the data collected. Results: The results suggest that the participants felt influenced by several manifestations of power within healthcare. We argue that this demonstrates that imperial practices can influence knowledge, interaction and context and therefore affect how healthcare practitioners make decisions. Conclusion: By acknowledging the impact of imperialism and power dynamics on healthcare provision and clinical reasoning we can potentially begin to transform the epistemology from which we approach healthcare provision in favour of one which is better suited to the current realities of healthcare to allow for equitable service provision.

Lived experiences of South African rehabilitation practitioners during coronavirus disease 2019

“…Interestingly, one participant noted that factors like race, gender and age weren't as crucial as the amount of clinical experience they had. This viewpoint contrasts with a previous argument by Pillay and Pillay (2021) that highlighted the role of race and social identities in rehabilitation practice, particularly in cases like dysphagia rehabilitation in South Africa.…”

Who really decides? Feeding decision-making ‘made’ by caregivers of children with cerebral palsy

“…Traditionally, clinical decisions were made in deference to a biomedical model (Pillay & Pillay, 2021 ) that adhered to a paternalistic, ‘doctor knows best’ approach (Manyonga et al, 2014 ). This approach has since evolved into a more consumerist model, emphasising patient empowerment, autonomy and the protection of patients’ and consumers’ rights (Rowe & Moodley, 2013 ).…”