2002
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200208000-00044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Practice of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: A Survey of Academic Medical Centers in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Moore & Batra, 1981) A survey of academic medical centers in the United States found that 83% of the respondents indicated they use a test dose, whereas 6% do not. (Minzter et al, 2002) …”
Section: Epidural Test Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Moore & Batra, 1981) A survey of academic medical centers in the United States found that 83% of the respondents indicated they use a test dose, whereas 6% do not. (Minzter et al, 2002) …”
Section: Epidural Test Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most effective technique for acute pain management after thoracic surgery is thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). Several surveys have demonstrated that more than 50% (54%–85.6%) of thoracic anesthesiologists use TEA as the first-line treatment option for pain management [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. However, TEA induces vasodilation below the level of the block, commonly resulting in hypotension, which may be exacerbated and have negative consequences for patients with higher risk of SAM and LVOTO [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most anesthesiologists agree that a thoracic “test dose” is important, no evidence-based standard recipe for this procedure exists. 59,60 Prevalent practice has been to adopt one of the commonly used lumbar regimens. However, lumbar dosing is guided by experience from spinal anesthesia, anticipating that a positive test result in a sitting patient would develop no more than a traditional “saddle block.” In contrast, thoracic dosing has no equivalent to spinal anesthesia for guidance.…”
Section: Analgesic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%