2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pragmatics of conversational humour in social visits: French and Australian English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A form of mock-impoliteness occurring in the ACE data set is jocular mockery (Goddard, 2006;Haugh, 2010Haugh, , 2014, wherein a producer makes a mocking or diminishing remark to a recipient, often in response to some error or faux pas by the latter (Norrick, 1994). Crucially, mock-impoliteness has also been identified as a characteristic feature of Anglo-Australian humour (Béal and Mullan, 2017;Goddard, 2017;Haugh, 2010Haugh, , 2014Haugh and Bousfield, 2012;Sinkeviciute, 2019).…”
Section: 511mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A form of mock-impoliteness occurring in the ACE data set is jocular mockery (Goddard, 2006;Haugh, 2010Haugh, , 2014, wherein a producer makes a mocking or diminishing remark to a recipient, often in response to some error or faux pas by the latter (Norrick, 1994). Crucially, mock-impoliteness has also been identified as a characteristic feature of Anglo-Australian humour (Béal and Mullan, 2017;Goddard, 2017;Haugh, 2010Haugh, , 2014Haugh and Bousfield, 2012;Sinkeviciute, 2019).…”
Section: 511mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to self-denigrate is claimed to be highly valued in Anglo-Australian discourse (Béal and Mullan, 2017;Goddard, 2006Goddard, , 2009Goddard, , 2017Haugh, 2012;Peters, 2007;Sinkeviciute, 2014Sinkeviciute, , 2019: it reflects a cultural principle emphasising ordinariness, familiarity and friendliness, along with the admonishment to play down one's admirable characteristics, abilities or achievements (Goddard, 2006), and deflect or reject praise of these. It may also appease interlocutors' negative face, since it suggests (albeit humorously) that any face threat to a recipient is the fault of the producer.…”
Section: 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations