DOI: 10.22215/etd/2018-13238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pragmatics of Requesting in the Canadian Workplace: A Comparative Investigation of Requests Presented in Workplace ESL Textbooks and Oral Discourse Completion Task Responses

Abstract: Within the workplace, pragmatic competence contributes to the performance of difficult speech acts such as requests (Wigglesworth & Yates, 2007). A prevalent concern in teaching second language (L2) pragmatics involves pedagogical materials (Bardovi-Harlig, 2017). Although previous research has found discrepancies in pragmatic language seen in L2 textbooks and elicited responses via discourse completion tasks (DCTs) (e.g. Pablos-Ortega, 2011), workplace language textbooks have seldom been investigated. Therefo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unbalanced focus on transaction language might not be as useful as providing a balance of transactional language and social aspects of language, as the ability to socialize with co-workers determines the success an employee has in a job more than the employee's ability to complete tasks (Holmes, 2005). Furthermore, many of these materials have been deemed unsuitable, as they do not reflect actual language used in the workplace (Chan, 2017;Ross, 2018), or they do not place attention on important social aspects of communication between employees (Holmes, 2005;Newton & Kusmierczyk, 2011).…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unbalanced focus on transaction language might not be as useful as providing a balance of transactional language and social aspects of language, as the ability to socialize with co-workers determines the success an employee has in a job more than the employee's ability to complete tasks (Holmes, 2005). Furthermore, many of these materials have been deemed unsuitable, as they do not reflect actual language used in the workplace (Chan, 2017;Ross, 2018), or they do not place attention on important social aspects of communication between employees (Holmes, 2005;Newton & Kusmierczyk, 2011).…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%