2016
DOI: 10.1093/tcbh/hwv042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘The Pragmatist’s Solution to Poverty’: The Heath Government’s Tax Credit Scheme and the Politics of Social Policy in the 1970s

Abstract: The 'rediscovery of poverty' in mid-1960s prompted a wide-ranging debate over how the British government could best support low-paid workers and their families.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Rather than statutorily abolishing it, a better strategy was felt to be to 'allow it to wither away'25 through the introduction of the Conservative's Tax Credit proposal. Had it been introduced, it would have replaced the personal tax allowance and alleviated the 'poverty trap' (Sloman, 2016). This suggested approach can be read as continuing what had been happening since the 1960s when the NJCLA was used to calculate levels at which assistance was wage-stopped and other benefits were introduced that either supported only low paid workers (family income supplement) or poor people generally, including those in wage-labour (domestic rate and rent rebates).26…”
Section: The Administrative Burden Of the Wage-stopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Rather than statutorily abolishing it, a better strategy was felt to be to 'allow it to wither away'25 through the introduction of the Conservative's Tax Credit proposal. Had it been introduced, it would have replaced the personal tax allowance and alleviated the 'poverty trap' (Sloman, 2016). This suggested approach can be read as continuing what had been happening since the 1960s when the NJCLA was used to calculate levels at which assistance was wage-stopped and other benefits were introduced that either supported only low paid workers (family income supplement) or poor people generally, including those in wage-labour (domestic rate and rent rebates).26…”
Section: The Administrative Burden Of the Wage-stopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such plans to streamline welfare and the tax system were popular within the Conservative Party, which would allow them to reduce administrative costs by abolishing the PAYE method of taxation in favour of the flat rate. However, Cockfield’s plans were unable to command the bipartisan support needed to be introduced, and were later abandoned by the subsequent Labour government (Sloman, 2016).…”
Section: A ‘Trojan Horse’?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Inland Revenue embraced this proposal because it was coming under pressure from ministers to reduce administrative costs: tax credits would make it possible to abandon the complex coding work associated with PAYE in favour of a flat-rate deduction from pay for most workers. The Treasury minister Patrick Jenkin was ‘enormously impressed’ by the scheme's ingenuity, and Joseph saw ‘very great attractions from the social security point of view’ in reducing dependence on means-testing (Sloman, 2016b).…”
Section: The Third Wave: the Rediscovery Of Poverty And The Heath Govmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the time Labour returned to office in 1974, the fiscal outlook had deteriorated and Treasury officials warned that even a scaled-back version would pose ‘a very significant budgetary problem’. Denis Healey duly scrapped the scheme, retaining only the child credit proposals – now paid in cash to the main carer – under the title of Child Benefit (Sloman, 2016b).…”
Section: The Third Wave: the Rediscovery Of Poverty And The Heath Govmentioning
confidence: 99%