2010
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5359.101806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pre-hospital delay in seeking treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction referring to a central hospital in Kashan, Iran

Abstract: Despite having only 25% of the patients referring to this center by ambulance, most patients arrived on time to the hospital.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the median delay was 216 minutes in London (15), and 56.2% of patients presented to a hospital within 240 minutes of symptom onset in India (16). The mean delay time was 127 ± 174 minute in a previous study in Kashan (17). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In addition, the median delay was 216 minutes in London (15), and 56.2% of patients presented to a hospital within 240 minutes of symptom onset in India (16). The mean delay time was 127 ± 174 minute in a previous study in Kashan (17). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…3 Pre-hospital delay is affected by age of the patient, severity of angina pain, history of CAD and perception of symptom as a cardiac problem. 4 Variables that significantly predict pre-hospital delay are misinterpretation of nature of pain, illiteracy and pain resistance behaviour. Interventions to decrease pre-hospital delay must focus on improving public awareness of AMI symptoms and early treatment benefits.…”
Section: How To Cite This Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a minority of patients with AMI (35.7%) arrived at the hospital during the first hour of symptom onset, 7.9% 24 hours after symptom onset in Bandar Abbas, 12 and 69.0% 2 hours after symptom onset in Kashan. 15 In other articles, the mean (±SD) pre-hospital delay was 7.40 (±16.25) hours in Gilan, 14 127.00 (±174.00) minutes in Kashan, 13 265.60 minutes (among patients with acute coronary syndromes), 18 149.00 (±120.00) minutes in Isfahan, 19 and 146.00±20.00 minutes in Tehran among patients transferred in Emergency Medical System (EMS) ambulances. 20 The median time of hospital arrival, according to various articles, was 279 (interquartile range [IQR], 120 to 630) minutes, 16 258 (IQR, 108 to 574) minutes, 21 3 (min-max: 0.5148) hours, 22 and 244 (IQR, 109 to 565) minutes 23 in Tehran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Patients with a higher level of education had a lower rate of prehospital delays 12 , 16 and vice versa. 13 , 14 The most common causes of delays were unawareness of coronary artery disease 12 and waiting for improvement. 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%