Ancient Supercontinents and the Paleogeography of Earth 2021
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818533-9.00016-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Precambrian drift history and paleogeography of Congo−São Francisco craton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent compilations of the Precambrian paleomagnetic data for Amazonian, São Francisco and Río de la Plata Cratons were presented by D'Agrella-Filho et al ( 2021); Trindade et al (2021) and Rapalini et al (2021), respectively. This database is updated in Table 1, summarizing the paleomagnetic poles between 2.8 and 0.5 Ga for these three cratons published between 2021 and 2023.…”
Section: Paleomagnetic Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent compilations of the Precambrian paleomagnetic data for Amazonian, São Francisco and Río de la Plata Cratons were presented by D'Agrella-Filho et al ( 2021); Trindade et al (2021) and Rapalini et al (2021), respectively. This database is updated in Table 1, summarizing the paleomagnetic poles between 2.8 and 0.5 Ga for these three cratons published between 2021 and 2023.…”
Section: Paleomagnetic Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing the longevity of Columbia is hampered by the scarcity and low quality of paleomagnetic poles available for the several cratonic blocks that composed it. Trindade et al (2021) tried to compare apparent polar wander paths for North China, Congo-São…”
Section: Columbia Longevitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only two main Archean‐Paleoproterozoic portions of the basement are exposed in the southern and northeastern cratonic margin (e.g., Teixeira et al., 2017). The final amalgamation of the Congo‐São Francisco Craton (Trindade et al., 2021) is mainly recorded in two Paleoproterozoic mobile belts: (a) the Itabuna‐Salvador‐Curaçá belt in the northeastern SFC, whose rocks reached high‐degree metamorphism (Barbosa et al., 2008), and (b) the Mineiro belt in the southern SFC, which consists of granitoids and a volcano‐sedimentary succession metamorphosed at greenschist to amphibolite facies (Alkmim & Marshak, 1998). Following the amalgamation, several mafic dyke swarms of similar compositions and ages were emplaced on the coastline of the northeastern SFC during the early Neoproterozoic, in response to the post‐assembly extension (Chaves et al., 2019).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally believed that supercontinents, Nuna and Rodinia, were formed during Paleo‐Neoproterozoic times, followed by the southern supercontinent Gondwana in the Neoproterozoic–Early Paleozoic, northern supercontinent Laurasia in Late Paleozoic, and the most recent supercontinent, Pangea at ∼250 Ma. Over the past three decades, numerous efforts have been dedicated to the reconstruction of supercontinent's paleogeography in order to build a solid basis for supercontinent geodynamics (e.g., Evans et al., 2016; Nance & Murphy, 2013; Trindade et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation