2010
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The precancerous effect of emitted cooking oil fumes on precursor lesions of cervical cancer

Abstract: Although cooking emission from high-temperature frying has been deemed a Group 2A carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, little is known about its impact on cervical tumorigenesis. To investigate the precancerous consequence of cooking oil fumes on cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN), a community-based case-control study, which takes all known risk factors into consideration, was conducted in Taiwan. From 2003 to 2008, in a Pap smear screening and biopsy examination network, 206 pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors that change the effect of interest by 410%, and/or that were determined to be confounders in previous studies, were considered to be confounding factors. 28,29 Covariates that were adjusted for in the final regression models included: study area (Kaohsiung city, Pingtung county, Taitung county), age (year), gender, physical activity (tertiles), total calories (kcal per day), the intake of meat (o7 and X7 servings per week), seafood (o1, 1-3, X4 servings per day), fruit (1-6, 7, 47 servings per week), fried food (o1, 1-3, X4 times per week) and food with jelly/honey (o1, 1-3, X4 times per week), as well as the status of alcohol drinking (no, yes) and cigarette smoking (no, yes). To investigate the influence of SSB consumption on being overweight or obese (defined as BMI 25-29.9 and X30 kg m À 2 , respectively), as well as on hyperuricemia (no and yes for definitions I and II), we separately used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to estimate the related risks, which were measured using an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Factors that change the effect of interest by 410%, and/or that were determined to be confounders in previous studies, were considered to be confounding factors. 28,29 Covariates that were adjusted for in the final regression models included: study area (Kaohsiung city, Pingtung county, Taitung county), age (year), gender, physical activity (tertiles), total calories (kcal per day), the intake of meat (o7 and X7 servings per week), seafood (o1, 1-3, X4 servings per day), fruit (1-6, 7, 47 servings per week), fried food (o1, 1-3, X4 times per week) and food with jelly/honey (o1, 1-3, X4 times per week), as well as the status of alcohol drinking (no, yes) and cigarette smoking (no, yes). To investigate the influence of SSB consumption on being overweight or obese (defined as BMI 25-29.9 and X30 kg m À 2 , respectively), as well as on hyperuricemia (no and yes for definitions I and II), we separately used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to estimate the related risks, which were measured using an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A fundamental regression model including age, sex and study area was used to assess potential confounders. Factors that altered the effect of interest by >10% or that had been determined as confounders in prior studies were considered confounding factors [27,28]. Covariates, including study area, age, physical activity, total calories, the intake of meat, fruit, fried food, food with jelly/honey, alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking, were evaluated as confounders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A basic regression model including age, gender and study area was used to appraise potential confounders. Variables that altered the effect of interest by >10% or that had been established as confounders by previous studies were regarded as confounding factors [30], [31]. Pearson's correlation tests were used to examine the possible linear association of RBP4 with anthropometric and clinical parameters among adolescents who consumed different types of SSBs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%