2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The precarious practice of forensic psychiatric risk assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated risk of relapse in serious criminality is thus the dividing line between patients' sentences to treatment with and without a SCS. In practice, the nature of the index crime has been shown to play a major role in these risk assessments (Nilsson, Munthe, Gustavson, Forsman, & Anckarsäter, 2009), and therefore we were not surprised to find violent index crime one of the strongest risk factors for long hospital stay in this study. On the other hand, the fact that absconding was the only risk incident or adverse event significantly linked to longer hospital stay was surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The estimated risk of relapse in serious criminality is thus the dividing line between patients' sentences to treatment with and without a SCS. In practice, the nature of the index crime has been shown to play a major role in these risk assessments (Nilsson, Munthe, Gustavson, Forsman, & Anckarsäter, 2009), and therefore we were not surprised to find violent index crime one of the strongest risk factors for long hospital stay in this study. On the other hand, the fact that absconding was the only risk incident or adverse event significantly linked to longer hospital stay was surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Further, it is challenging to ensure that an assessment does not result in discrepancies between how the forensic nursing staff perceive risk, and how the team or individual risk assessor scores the patient risk (Samuels et al, 2005). Besides, it is not uncommon that the risk assessor is also the caregiver of the patients, which could result in conscientious risk analysis (Nilsson et al, 2009). Finally, one of the most significant challenges of how well clinicians succeeded in implementing knowledge into practice, is whether or not they are guided by a visionary leadership and work in a care unit where participation and reflexive learning are encouraged (Harvey & Kitson, 2016).…”
Section: Challenges Related To Forensic Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In violence-risk research, there is broad agreement that an absolute risk is impossible to establish (Sing, Fazel, Gueorguieva, & Buchanan, 2014) and, further, that a RA constantly needs updating (Nilsson, Munthe, Gustavson, Forsman, & Anckarsäter, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the accuracy of prediction and control of high risk behaviour in specific offender groups has been discarded by the use of heterogeneous samples in conjunction with the homogeneity of the determinants being studied (Quinsey et al, 2006). In line with evidence based medicine (EBM), 'What Works' principles and best practice guidelines, there is a need for specific explanations for different types of offenders and for different types of offences (Andrews & Bonta, 2010;Bradford, Fedoroff & Gulati, 2013;De Vogel, Stam, Bouman, Ter Horst & Lancel, 2015;Heilbrun, 2009;Nilsson, Munthe, Gustavson, Forsman & Anckarsäter, 2009;Quinsey et al, 2006).…”
Section: Forensic Psychiatry; a Composed Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%