The Precarious Present: Wageless Labor and Disrupted Life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between precarity as a labor condition and precarity as an ontological experience in the lives of urban poor in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The focus is on a garbage dump on the outskirts of the city where thousands of Rio’s poor, known as catadores, reclaim recyclables for a living. Attending to cyclic moments in which these workers leave the dump for other jobs and then return, I explore how everyday emergencies in Rio’s periphery often clash with the rigid conditions of regular, wage-labor employment. These comings and goings of catadores result from a tension between the desire for “real” work and the desire for what I describe as relational autonomy, made possible by the conditions of wageless work. The article considers how specific histories and experiences of capitalism in the global South differentially shape the articulation of precarious labor with precarious life. I conclude by suggesting that the returns of catadores to the dump do not signal an end for Rio’s poor, but rather constitute a politics of detachment that enables life to be lived in fragile times.

Cuidado nos tempos de Zika: notas da pós-epidemia em Salvador (Bahia), Brasil

“…Being in their majority black women 39 , they have a lower life expectancy than do white women 40,41 , a product of the structural racism that leads to less access to health services and higher rates of community violenceincluding state violence 40,[42][43][44][45] . Being black women from the lowest-earning social classes, economic and labor precarities-which particularly after the parliamentary coup have only increased dailyare never far 46 . And being women, they confront the machismo Paradoxically, hope is expressed precisely through expecting nothing -a facet of the -practice of hope‖ that Mattingly proposes 22 .…”

Ethnography and the Choices Posed by the ‘Affective Turn’

“…Many both evoke affect and seek to analyse it in hermeneutical and critical ways that are not radically different from how they proceed with other matters (see e.g. Muehlebach and Shoshan 2012;Millar 2014; Navaro-Yashin 2012). I will not dwell on this common ground between affect theory and such anthropological studies of questions of affect.…”

Sensitive Objects: Affect and Material Culture

“…Many both evoke affect and seek to analyse it in hermeneutical and critical ways that are not radically different from how they proceed with other matters (see e.g. Muehlebach and Shoshan 2012;Millar 2014;). I will not dwell on this common ground between affect theory and such anthropological studies of questions of affect.…”