The predicament of primary physical education: a consequence of ‘insufficient’ ITT and ‘ineffective’ CPD?

Abstract

Background: Research on primary physical education (PE) in England and other countries has shown that it is an aspect of the curriculum that has suffered from sparse initial teacher training (ITT). As a consequence of 'insufficient' time spent on PE in ITT (PE-ITT), primary teachers often have low levels of confidence and competence with respect to teaching the subject. Evidence also points to inadequacies in traditional forms of professional development in PE (PE-CPD), leading to calls for more effective ways of developing teachers' competence to deliver high quality PE.Purpose: To explore primary school teachers' experiences of PE during ITT, the PE context in their schools prior to them engaging in a national PE-CPD programme, and teachers' perceptions of the immediate and longer-term effects of this programme. Setting and participants: Primary school teachers in five Local Education Authorities in England.Research design and data collection: A combination of quantitative and qualitative methodological approaches were adopted, including: pre-course audits, course evaluations, focus groups and semi-structured interviews. The pre-course audits captured information about the teachers' experiences of PE-ITT and the PE context in their schools views prior to them engaging in the CPD. The course evaluations focused on initial impressions of the PE-CPD, and the focus groups and interviews captured the teachers' perceptions of its longer-term effects.Findings: For up to half of the teachers, their PE-ITT was 'insufficient' in terms of the time dedicated to it and the breadth of coverage of the subject. The PE-CPD programme, which was designed in the light of 'insufficient' PE-ITT, did demonstrate some features of effective CPD in that it was considered relevant to classroom practice and partially addressed a few of their many needs (especially in relation to content ideas and inclusive practice). However, its effectiveness was limited due to: its short time span and minimal engagement with teachers; a heavy reliance on resources; and the absence of follow-up support. In addition, it did not adequately address known areas of development for primary PE (such as medium to long-term planning and assessment) and was challenged in meeting the diverse needs of primary teachers of 5-11 year olds. Furthermore, inadequate PE time and reduced opportunities to teach PE in some schools limited implementation of learning from the PE-CPD. Conclusions:In summary, the findings of this study confirmed that PE-ITT continues to be 'insufficient' for many primary teachers and that the PE-CPD in question was not, and could never have been, the panacea for the inherent issues within and predicament of primary PE. In effect, PE-CPD programmes of limited duration and engagement with teachers, a heavy reliance on resources, and no planned follow-up support could not hope to compensate for long-term systemic weaknesses such as inadequate primary PE-ITT. These might be more effectively addressed through professional development programmes which...

Who teaches primary physical education? Change and transformation through the eyes of subject leaders

“…The perceived shortcomings of generalist class teachers in this study adds weight to a wellrehearsed view (see, for example, Elliott, Atencio, Campbell, & Jess, 2013;Harris, Cale, & Musson, 2012;Morgan & Hansen, 2008) neatly summarized by Tsangaridou (2012, p. 281) thus: "A significant number of primary school teachers have low levels of confidence, do not possess the skills and knowledge to deliver appropriate PE instruction, have limited content knowledge and do not feel competent teaching PE". All-in-all, then, the main argument for sports coaches tended to be an implicitly negative one: put starkly, sports coaches were deemed better than many primary teachers because of the inherent weaknesses among the latter.…”

“…Directly or indirectly, the SLs in this study outlined a scenario in which a shift towards sports coaches and away from generalist class teachers and, albeit to a lesser extent, specialist PE SLs was well underway. In light of the (perhaps inevitable) failure of teacher training to address many of the inherent weaknesses in primary generalist teachers' capacity to deliver PE (Elliott, Atencio, Campbell & Jess, 2013;Harris, Cale, & Musson, 2012) revolved around what might broadly be termed educational suitability and viability, the more significant drivers for change appeared quite prosaic. There were (and continue to be) good economic and pragmatic reasons for schools to employ sports coaches: economic in the sense that sports coaches were cheaper, pragmatic in the sense that the use of coaches dealt with the reluctance and inability of many generalist teachers to deliver PE.…”

Knowing in primary physical education in the UK: negotiating movement culture

“…Utilising pedagogical models to deliver PE curricula and help navigate the difficult terrain created by competition, inclusion and cooperation may be a way forward (Pope, 2011). However, this solution is out of reach to the majority of non-specialist teachers, particularly when set in the context of limited teacher training and continuous professional development in addition to low self-confidence to deliver PE (DeCorby, Halas, Dixon, Wintrup, & Janzen, 2005;Harris, Cale, & Musson, 2012;Morgan & Bourke 2008;2008). These conditions in addition to the recent £150 million continuation of the Pupil Premium for PE [Her Majesty's (HM) Treasury, 2013] will continue to play their part in remodelling movement culture within primary schools.…”

Examining South Korea s Elementary Physical Education Performance Assessment Using Assessment Literacy Perspectives

“…Based on this information, I would like to present three ways to address these issues: First, the educational paths for current teachers to develop elementary school teachers' assessment literacy should be diversified. PE training programs for those currently teaching in the field for elementary schools are quantitatively and qualitatively insufficient (Lawrence, 2003;Harris et al, 2012). In-service teacher education, geared towards enhancing expertise in assessment, has been scarce (Stinggins & Conklin, 1992;Nitko & Brookhart, 2011).…”