2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prediction of bankruptcy of small- and medium-sized industrial firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
105
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity test on the SE discriminant function gives a global accuracy level of 80.58% with 18.74% of Type 1 errors and 20,10% Type 2 errors, while the same test on the SMLE discriminant function gives 20,80% Type 1 errors, 22,20%% Type 2 errors and an overall accuracy of 78.5%. These results confirm H1: small firms have their own specific structural and strategic characteristics, which are unlike those of large firms (Ciampi, 1994;Ciampi, 2015;Pompe & Bilderbeek, 2005) and consequently their credit risk profiles are significantly different from larger companies. Financial institutions should therefore use credit rating models specifically built for SEs in order to maximize their capacity to create value for their shareholders (Altman & Sabato, 2007).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The validity test on the SE discriminant function gives a global accuracy level of 80.58% with 18.74% of Type 1 errors and 20,10% Type 2 errors, while the same test on the SMLE discriminant function gives 20,80% Type 1 errors, 22,20%% Type 2 errors and an overall accuracy of 78.5%. These results confirm H1: small firms have their own specific structural and strategic characteristics, which are unlike those of large firms (Ciampi, 1994;Ciampi, 2015;Pompe & Bilderbeek, 2005) and consequently their credit risk profiles are significantly different from larger companies. Financial institutions should therefore use credit rating models specifically built for SEs in order to maximize their capacity to create value for their shareholders (Altman & Sabato, 2007).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This finding may be explained in two different ways. First, it could potentially qualify the low predictive power of the bankruptcy variables selected, even if this goes against the empirical literature on the subject (in particular, the findings of Altman, 1968;Frydman et al, 1985;Ooghe and Van Wymeersch, 2000;Pompe and Bilderbeek, 2005). Then, the relevance of using this methodology in the context of bankruptcy prediction could also be questioned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representation on the first two axes (for axes 2 and 3 also) pointed out a high concentration of companies at the origin of the axes, not allowing for healthy firms to be adequately discriminated from failing ones, from the variables initially selected. However, the choice of variables should not be called into question because, on the one hand, they are used in many articles in the literature (Altman, 1968;Taffler, 1982;Ooghe and Van Wymeersch, 2000;Pompe and Bilderbeek, 2005), and on the other hand, the discriminating power of these variables was confirmed using logistic regression (most variables one year, three years and five years before bankruptcy were significant). The principal components analysis method associated with the Ward criterion and mobile centres applied to the prediction of bankruptcy was not found to be effective for determining a sufficient number of classes composed of a majority of healthy or failing firms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ohlson 1980, Altman 2000, Becchetti and Sierra 2003, Pompe and Bilderbeek 2005, the public sector has failed to draw such a great attention from researchers. Consequently, the academic literature in the field is primarily directed towards the private sector both in terms of theoretical and empirical approaches.…”
Section: Overview Of the Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%