1972
DOI: 10.1109/tia.1972.349783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prediction of Current Distribution in Induction Heating Installations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two vortices induced by electromagnetic force for each quarter of the droplet, which were observed in many works. [15,16,[23][24][25][26] The isotherm lines of ours and those in Reference 15 are very familiar, with a relative error of less than 0.5 pct. The maximum velocity by our calculation is 4.47 cm/s, very close to that of 4.39 cm/s.…”
Section: B Fluid Flow and Temperature Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are two vortices induced by electromagnetic force for each quarter of the droplet, which were observed in many works. [15,16,[23][24][25][26] The isotherm lines of ours and those in Reference 15 are very familiar, with a relative error of less than 0.5 pct. The maximum velocity by our calculation is 4.47 cm/s, very close to that of 4.39 cm/s.…”
Section: B Fluid Flow and Temperature Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[20] Applying an extra static magnetic field, the sample in electromagnetic levitation device appears to be more stable [21][22][23] Tsukada and coworkers [24,25] suggested the measurement of thermal conductivity of molten Si can be implemented precisely when a static magnetic field of 4T is applied. In most previous work, the calculations of magnetic field were usually based on an old algorithm of mutual inductance [26] which derived the vector potential from Maxwell equations for simplification and considered current distribution in coils as a constant value. Thus, eddy effect of coils was ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even so, the open-bounded nature of the EM field problem means that most techniques require additional gridding of the free space surrounding the melt and coil, significantly reducing computational efficiency. This led to the development of formulations based on the integral form of the Maxwell equations which eliminate the need to grid the free space [30][31][32][33]. One such method, the mutual inductance technique, was employed by El-Kaddah and the authors [34] to model the flow in a solidifying EM stirred melt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early numerical solutions to eddy current problems were generally obtained using Finite Difference [1,2] or Volume Integral Equation methods, the latter being primarily of the Modal Solution [3] or the Coupled Circuit [4] type. Then, the Finite Element method was applied to 2-D eddy current problem [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%