1975
DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1975.3.1.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prediction of fetal lung maturity from the surface tension characteristics of amniotic fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the most popular and employed biochemical methods for surfactant maturity testing include determination of: protein/phospholipids [9], and lecithin/sphingomyelin ratios in clinical samples [10][11][12][13][14]; the number of the lamellar bodies in amniotic fluid [14][15][16][17]; the presence of specific surfactant proteins [18], etc. In addition, the most commonly used biophysical methods for surfactant maturity assessment are: black foam film method [19,20]; decreasing the surface tension of clinical samples extractions [21,22]; foam stability test [15,[23][24][25]; microbubbles stability test [26][27][28]; click-method for bubbles formation [29][30][31], etc. The summary of the results from all these analyses shows that none of the techniques can find widespread application into the clinical practice; these methods are slow, require large quantity of the clinical sample, high qualified specialists, etc.…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the most popular and employed biochemical methods for surfactant maturity testing include determination of: protein/phospholipids [9], and lecithin/sphingomyelin ratios in clinical samples [10][11][12][13][14]; the number of the lamellar bodies in amniotic fluid [14][15][16][17]; the presence of specific surfactant proteins [18], etc. In addition, the most commonly used biophysical methods for surfactant maturity assessment are: black foam film method [19,20]; decreasing the surface tension of clinical samples extractions [21,22]; foam stability test [15,[23][24][25]; microbubbles stability test [26][27][28]; click-method for bubbles formation [29][30][31], etc. The summary of the results from all these analyses shows that none of the techniques can find widespread application into the clinical practice; these methods are slow, require large quantity of the clinical sample, high qualified specialists, etc.…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the second half of gestation, the specific weight of the fetus is 1,040–1,050 g ( Lu and Hsu, 1999 ) and the specific weight of the amniotic fluid is 1,002–1,010 g ( Okai, 1986 ). The surface tension of the amniotic fluid is 14–58 dyn/cm ( Muller-Tyl and Lempert, 1975 ), allowing contact between the fetal skin and the walls of the intrauterine cavity. Intrauterine pressure of amniotic fluid represents the sum of air pressure in the atmosphere, elasticity of the walls of amniotic fluid and hydrostatic pressure produced by the amniotic fluid column height.…”
Section: Physical Condition In the Second Half Of Gestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods involve Gluck et a1 (I 972) have studied extensively determination of total phospholipids (Gudson and Waiti, 1972), free fatty acids (Schirar et al, 1975), or physical measurement of surface tension (Muller-Tyl and Lempert, 1975), and the stability of foam as an expression of surface tension, which was introduced by Clements et al (1972). Other methods involve Gluck et a1 (I 972) have studied extensively determination of total phospholipids (Gudson and Waiti, 1972), free fatty acids (Schirar et al, 1975), or physical measurement of surface tension (Muller-Tyl and Lempert, 1975), and the stability of foam as an expression of surface tension, which was introduced by Clements et al (1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of fetal lung maturity. Other methods involve Gluck et a1 (I 972) have studied extensively determination of total phospholipids (Gudson and Waiti, 1972), free fatty acids (Schirar et al, 1975), or physical measurement of surface tension (Muller-Tyl and Lempert, 1975), and the stability of foam as an expression of surface tension, which was introduced by Clements et al (1972). The main disadvantages of the presently available methods derive from the fact that only selected components of the surfactant are determined, and that the accuracy of the method is highly dependent upon the total amount of lipids in the amniotic fluid, false positive and false negative results are common (Jackson et al, 1975;Turnbull et al, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%