1972
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,310
1
46

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,535 publications
(1,367 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
10
1,310
1
46
Order By: Relevance
“…Various turbulence models have been developed and validated; see Chen and Jaw (1998) and Wilcox (1998). The 'industry standard' turbulence model is the k-ε model that includes two transport equations for k and ε based on the work of Jones and Launder (1972) and Launder and Spalding (1974), with the constants of Launder and Sharma (1974). The eddy viscosity is calculated as / , where 0.09.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various turbulence models have been developed and validated; see Chen and Jaw (1998) and Wilcox (1998). The 'industry standard' turbulence model is the k-ε model that includes two transport equations for k and ε based on the work of Jones and Launder (1972) and Launder and Spalding (1974), with the constants of Launder and Sharma (1974). The eddy viscosity is calculated as / , where 0.09.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of chemical reaction on turbulence has attracted The treatment of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation ( ) also merits attention. The "standard" turbulent dissipation rate equation is based on the k´ model [40] formulated for constant-density flows. However, Mura and Champion [41] found that beyond a given value of the Bray number, the turbulent dissipation rate may be controlled by the flamelet structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of k-ω model in the inner regions of the boundary layer makes the formulation usable through the viscous sub-layer. To avoid the common problem of k-ω model that the model is too sensitive to the inlet free-stream turbulence properties [19], the SST model switches to k-ε [20] model in the free-stream. However, k-ε model was not able to capture accurately the turbulence of turbulent boundary layers due to separation [21].…”
Section: B the Sst Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%