“…Such studies differ drastically in experimental systems ( Tithonia diversifolia weed biomass [ 63 ], low-density polyethylene [ 64 ], high-density polyethylene [ 68 ], safflower seed press cake [ 65 ], durian rinds [ 69 ], rape straw [ 70 ], coal gangue and peanut shell [ 71 ], pet coke [ 72 ], sewage sludge and peanut shell [ 73 ], sewage sludge and coffee grounds [ 74 ], vegetable fibers [ 75 ], rice husk and sewage sludge [ 45 ], sludge, watermelon rind, corncob, and eucalyptus [ 76 ], Sargassum sp. seaweed [ 77 ], cotton cocoon shell, tea waste, and olive husk [ 66 ], mechanoactivated coals [ 78 ], cattle manure [ 79 ], lignocellulosic forest residue and olive oil residue [ 80 ], cotton cocoon shell, fabricated tea waste, olive husk, and hazelnut shell [ 81 ]) and in some minor details, but the general concept remains the same. Thus, we illustrate it with the study by Kataki et al [ 63 ], who used a neural network model (4-14-1) to predict the product yield for the pyrolysis of dried weed biomass.…”