2004
DOI: 10.1243/0954410041872843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prediction of the non-linear dynamics of a squeeze-film damped aero-engine rotor housed in a flexible support structure

Abstract: This paper shows how the non-linear dynamics of a rotor running in unsupported squeeze-film dampers (SFDs) housed in a flexible support structure can be efficiently modelled using an integrated analytical technique and a standard model for the SFDs. A test rig that reproduces, to a limited extent, the essential dynamic features of an aero-engine gas turbine is considered and the aim of the analysis is to assess the ability to predict and interpret the observed non-linear vibrations as indicated by amplitude-sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Bonellop [13] developed the receptance HB method to rapidly compute the steady-state periodic vibration of an entire aeroengine model. Similar methods were proposed by other researchers [14][15][16]. Wei and Zheng [8] conducted multi-harmonic response analysis of a dynamic system with local nonlinearities based on the DF method and linear receptance data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Bonellop [13] developed the receptance HB method to rapidly compute the steady-state periodic vibration of an entire aeroengine model. Similar methods were proposed by other researchers [14][15][16]. Wei and Zheng [8] conducted multi-harmonic response analysis of a dynamic system with local nonlinearities based on the DF method and linear receptance data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(15) and (17) is that the coefficients in Eq. (15) are complex numbers, and thus, the IHB method cannot be used directly.…”
Section: Ms a Cs A Ks A C S A K Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also well known that, under certain conditions, particulary high static loading, an SFD system can exhibit sub-harmonics in its response e.g. (Bonello et al., 2004b). Indeed, in the general case of RHBM, the fundamental frequency of the vibration would be a sub-harmonic Ω/Q where Q is a positive integer (Bonello and Pham, 2009).…”
Section: Inverse Rotor-bearing Problem and Application Of Rnn Invementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon marks a 'bifurcation' in the system dynamics, with the resultant stable vibration being either subharmonic, or more generally, aperiodic and termed '2-frequency' vibration as its frequency spectrum is composed of linear combinations k 1 f 1 AE k 0 f 0 of two fundamental frequencies f 1 , f 0 (k 0 is an integer). 5,6 In the case of MFU excitation of a linear system (as in the linear model of the dual-rotor system 7 ) the vibration response is simply the superposition of the responses to the individual rotors' unbalance excitations. However, in the case of MFU excitation of a nonlinear system (as in the real aero-engine) the vibrations induced by the individual unbalances are effectively 'mixed', so that the resultant frequency spectrum of the nominal vibration response of a twin-spool engine, for example, will have 'combination frequencies' of the general form k 1 f 1 AE k 2 f 2 where k 1 , k 2 are integers and f 1 , f 2 are the rotor speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the line of enquiry in Holmes and Dede's work 8 was not followed up, with research continuing on the nonlinear dynamics of single-rotor SFD systems. 5,6,[10][11][12] Moreover, unlike the test rig of Holmes and Dede, 8 recent experimental studies on SFDs in the multi-shaft context [13][14][15] are not particularly relevant to the representative engine types in Figure 1. For example, all test rigs in previous studies [13][14][15] involve a supported SFD (whose degree of nonlinearity is considerably less than an unsupported SFD); in Delgado and Andres' experiment, 13 the shaft is oriented vertically and in the dual-shaft test rigs of Gilbert et al 14 and Gupta and Chatterjee, 15 the SFD is supported by a parallel retainer (centralising) spring (squirrel cage).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%