2020
DOI: 10.1101/2019.12.31.891978
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive power of the microbiome exceeds that of genome-wide association studies in the discrimination of complex human disease

Abstract: Over the past decade, studies of the human genome and microbiome have deepened our understanding of the connections between human genes, environments, microbes, and disease. For example, the sheer number of indicators of the microbiome and human genetic common variants associated with disease has been immense, but clinical utility has been elusive. Here, we compared the predictive capabilities of the human microbiome versus human genomic common variants across 13 common diseases. We concluded that microbiomic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noticeable that predictions were better when only the microbiome influenced the phenotype than when the genome was the only source of variation, a phenomenon also observed with real data [11,12,19]. In this simulation, this occurs likely because the number of causative effects and of input variables (SNPs vs. OTUS) is smaller in the Microbiome or Indirect scenarios than in the Genome scenario.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noticeable that predictions were better when only the microbiome influenced the phenotype than when the genome was the only source of variation, a phenomenon also observed with real data [11,12,19]. In this simulation, this occurs likely because the number of causative effects and of input variables (SNPs vs. OTUS) is smaller in the Microbiome or Indirect scenarios than in the Genome scenario.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…On the other hand, since the groundbreaking study of Meuwissen, Hayes and Goddard [15], the prediction of complex traits using genome information has been embraced in both plant [16] and animal breeding [17] as well as in human genetics [18]. Therefore, a natural step further is combining host’s genome and microbiome information to improve complex-trait prediction, a topic that is currently receiving much attention [12,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest in this study that the response to fasting can also be individual and showed that it can depend on the baseline antioxidative status. Factors driving these differences would have to be evaluated in further studies including measurement of gut microbiome composition, as it was repeatedly showed to be an important factor driving personal susceptibility to disease ( Tierney et al, 2020 ). In addition, it was also shown that the gut microbiome dramatically changed during fasting, and were correlated to changes in energy metabolism ( Mesnage et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among humans, where the field of host microbiome research has been concentrated for the last decade, emerging results indicate the potential power of this research as a health indicator in more elusive species. Microbiome indicators of health outperform genome-wide association studies by nearly 20% [92], and certain microbial taxonomic groups have been linked with an increased probability of mortality [93]. In some cases, specific taxa have been linked with common diseases, such as autism [94], allergies [95], and obesity [96,97].…”
Section: Epidermal Microbial Variability and Individual Health Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%