2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06329-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive role of eye movements in mental arithmetic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between Congruent to Bright (small numbers and bright left, large numbers and bright right) and Congruent to Dark (small numbers and dark left, large numbers and dark right) was tested in every bin using a paired t-test and clusters were constituted by grouping all bins that showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). The multiple comparison issue was addressed by means of a nonparametric random permutation procedure in which pupil size was permuted randomly between the conditions across all the bins of a given trial and compared statistically by paired t-tests (for a similar procedure, see Sahan et al, 2021;Salvaggio et al, 2019Salvaggio et al, , 2022Maris & Oostenveld, 2007). Significant clusters were isolated using the same criteria as those described for the analysis of the non-permuted data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between Congruent to Bright (small numbers and bright left, large numbers and bright right) and Congruent to Dark (small numbers and dark left, large numbers and dark right) was tested in every bin using a paired t-test and clusters were constituted by grouping all bins that showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). The multiple comparison issue was addressed by means of a nonparametric random permutation procedure in which pupil size was permuted randomly between the conditions across all the bins of a given trial and compared statistically by paired t-tests (for a similar procedure, see Sahan et al, 2021;Salvaggio et al, 2019Salvaggio et al, , 2022Maris & Oostenveld, 2007). Significant clusters were isolated using the same criteria as those described for the analysis of the non-permuted data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has low reliability as attested by several failed replications (e.g., Colling et al, 2020;Fattorini et al, 2015;van Dijck et al, 2014) and is subject to response biases not implying spatial attention (Andres et al, 2020;Galarraga et al, 2021;Gevers et al, 2006;Proctor & Cho, 2006). A more direct approach to SNAs has consisted of using an eye-tracker to record overt attention shifts during various numerical tasks (Hartmann et al, 2015;Loetscher et al, 2010;Masson et al, 2018;Myachykov et al, 2016;Salvaggio et al, 2019Salvaggio et al, , 2022. The results converged to show that the serial order processing of numbers in working memory elicits eye movements along a left-to-right oriented axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect was maximal when the second operand appeared 300 ms after the operator. More recently, the time-resolved analysis of gaze position during arithmetic problem solving revealed differences in horizontal eye positions between addition and subtraction in two time windows -immediately after the presentation of the arithmetic operator and during response preparation (Salvaggio et al, 2022). These results suggest that early attentional effects emerge very rapidly upon the presentation of the arithmetic operator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Apart from simple counting and number comparison tasks, gaze behavior was also linked to mental arithmetic (Blini et al, 2019;Hartmann, 2022;Hartmann et al, 2015;Masson & Pesenti, 2023;Salvaggio et al, 2022). For example, Blini et al elicited optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) to investigate the potential functional role of eye movements in addition and subtraction.…”
Section: Imagery Associated With Numerical Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%