1995
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199504000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Predictive Value of Epitope Analysis in Highly Sensitized Patients Awaiting Renal Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observations are in agreement with those of other studies, which suggest that the immunogenic HLA class I specific epitope targets associated with the sera of highly sensitized patients can be predicted from the results of routine screening for the detection of HLA specific antibodies (Laundy & Bradley, 1995). Knowledge of the actual HLA class I specific epitope targets would permit prediction of acceptable mismatches and identification of suitable donors for highly sensitized patients (Duquesnoy et al ., 1991; Laundy & Bradley, 1994; Laundy & Bradley, 1995; Papassavas et al ., 2000a,b). Thus, in samples with high PRA levels, sensitive screening assays such as AHG‐CDC, flow cytometry and an ELISA technique should be used in parallel for the detection of HLA class I specific antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our observations are in agreement with those of other studies, which suggest that the immunogenic HLA class I specific epitope targets associated with the sera of highly sensitized patients can be predicted from the results of routine screening for the detection of HLA specific antibodies (Laundy & Bradley, 1995). Knowledge of the actual HLA class I specific epitope targets would permit prediction of acceptable mismatches and identification of suitable donors for highly sensitized patients (Duquesnoy et al ., 1991; Laundy & Bradley, 1994; Laundy & Bradley, 1995; Papassavas et al ., 2000a,b). Thus, in samples with high PRA levels, sensitive screening assays such as AHG‐CDC, flow cytometry and an ELISA technique should be used in parallel for the detection of HLA class I specific antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The shared or public epitopes have been used to define the major serological cross‐reactive group (CREG) epitope clusters (Fuller et al ., 1990a,b). High panel reactive antibodies (PRA) sera have been assumed to be multispecific, but it has become apparent that these sera generally contain a limited number of antibodies directed against very common, highly immunogenic epitopes that are expressed mainly on class I HLA antigens (Laundy & Bradley, 1995; Papassavas et al ., 2000a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient sera with low levels of panel reactivity mostly have antibodies specific for a single antigenic epitope present on individual HLA specificities (private epitopes) (17). In contrast, sera with high PRA predominantly contain antibody populations with specificity for antigenic epitopes that are common to several HLA specificities (public epitopes), termed cross‐reactive groups (CREGs) (18–21). In humans, all HLA‐A and B antigens can be defined in just 10 major CREGs that are considered to constitute the main B‐cell target epitopes (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunologic status of potential kidney transplant recipients has an impact on transplant outcome. The presence of HLA antibodies is associated with reduced graft survival (1–4). Therefore, accurate detection of these antibodies is important for identifying the sensitized patients, who are at the high risk of post‐transplant rejection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%