2018
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.22169-17.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictor role of the aqueduct cerebrospinal fluid flow on endoscopic third ventriculostomy: explication on assumption physical model

Abstract: The flow pattern in the aqueduct was normalised and velocity was increased compared with those of preoperative values after a successful ETV. The flow of CSF in the prepontine cistern is routinely used for ventriculostomy patency assessment. In addition, aqueduct measurements may be useful in predicting ventriculostomy patency. The physical model provides valuable insights on a possible mechanism that affected the experimental data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have evaluated CSF flow in normal participants as well as pathological flow in patients with hydrocephalus (1,(6)(7)(8). PC-MRI has also been used to evaluate the patency of third ventriculostomies as well as shunt catheter flow (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have evaluated CSF flow in normal participants as well as pathological flow in patients with hydrocephalus (1,(6)(7)(8). PC-MRI has also been used to evaluate the patency of third ventriculostomies as well as shunt catheter flow (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, despite the development of several semi-automated segmentation methods (14,15), manual ROI segmentation is still widely used (112). Although quantitative assessments of SV have been conducted at the aqueductal level, current calculation methods only select a static area of the ROI or use semi-automated methods for adapting contours at different time points and do not evaluate the impact of area changes on SV, even though other factors affecting flow measures were evaluated (1117).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation