2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preference for sustainable coffee and a new approach for dealing with hypothetical bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[50,51]). For example, some studies have found that WTP estimates are subject to hypothetical bias [52,53], meaning that individuals overstate how much they would pay compared to a real situation. This could be a reason that the WTPs measured here exceed previous estimates of the amounts spent on programmes in reality [16,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[50,51]). For example, some studies have found that WTP estimates are subject to hypothetical bias [52,53], meaning that individuals overstate how much they would pay compared to a real situation. This could be a reason that the WTPs measured here exceed previous estimates of the amounts spent on programmes in reality [16,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of evaluation tools has become a major barrier to policy-making [50]. For example, field experiments have questioned the credibility of the effects of sustainability labels [9]. However, the field environment is also much noisier, and habitual decision making is not fully accounted for in previous implementations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, consumers' habitual decision making is not fully accounted for. Meanwhile, field experiments have provided alternative and more credible estimates of consumer choices in relation to sustainable products [9]. Evaluating consumers' real purchase behaviour becomes a clear trend in sustainability studies.…”
Section: Methodology Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consumer behavior literature has predominantly examined consumer preferences for product attribute(s) based on survey or choice experiments data (Hu, Batte, Woods, & Ernst, 2012; Hu, Woods, & Bastin, 2009; Kikulwe, Birol, Wesseler, & Falck‐Zepeda, 2011). The potential drawback of such methods is the hypothetical bias—consumers might not behave in the same manner in an actual retail purchasing setting as they indicate in a survey or choice experiment (Wuepper, Clemm, & Wree, 2019).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%