1995
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.32.2.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prenatal exclusion test for Huntington's disease: experience in the west of Scotland, 1986-1993.

Abstract: Information about the prenatal exclusion test for Huntington's disease (HD) The families Nine of the 10 couples who subsequently underwent exclusion testing were married and one couple married between their first and second tests. All couples were specifically counselled about the exclusion test at least once in the preconception period by the same geneticist and on a second occasion by the same or another geneticist. Four consultands had the exclusion test explained on three occasions before undergoing chor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 -21 In most reported cases, couples went ahead with the TOP. Tolmie et al reported 22 the lowest rate of declining TOP after an unfavourable exclusion test (three out of nine), which also raises the problem of the child's right not to know since, if the parent develops the disease, the child is at high risk of being affected. 7 For all other reports, the TOP uptake was close to 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 -21 In most reported cases, couples went ahead with the TOP. Tolmie et al reported 22 the lowest rate of declining TOP after an unfavourable exclusion test (three out of nine), which also raises the problem of the child's right not to know since, if the parent develops the disease, the child is at high risk of being affected. 7 For all other reports, the TOP uptake was close to 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tolmie described a group of UK families who had difficulty with their decision to terminate an at risk pregnancy following exclusion testing. 16 Three out of nine high-risk pregnancies were continued. Clarke 17 demonstrated the problems associated with cases where an unfavourable result is produced, but the pregnancy continues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 An important objection to exclusion testing is that the highest possible risk for the fetus is 50%. This is sometimes difficult to accept as reported by Tolmie et al 18 In a series of 13 prenatal exclusion tests, four tested at low risk, and nine tested at high risk. Of these nine patients, three declined TOP, although all three patients had intended to go ahead with the TOP if an unfavourable result were obtained after PND.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%