2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preparation and properties of high-strength porous mullite ceramics by a novel non-toxic gelcasting process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, there were two series of macropores discernible in the SiC ceramics fabricated by the foaming method, forming unique hierarchically macroporous structures: these are the 1st modal macropores with pore sizes ranging from 0.5 to 3 mm and the 2nd modal pores with pore size approximately 2 μm. To our knowledge, the conventional foaming approach often produces a monomodal porous structure [ 34 , 35 ]. In contrast, SiC porous ceramics with a hierarchically macroporous structure, as reported here, were obtained in a facile way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, there were two series of macropores discernible in the SiC ceramics fabricated by the foaming method, forming unique hierarchically macroporous structures: these are the 1st modal macropores with pore sizes ranging from 0.5 to 3 mm and the 2nd modal pores with pore size approximately 2 μm. To our knowledge, the conventional foaming approach often produces a monomodal porous structure [ 34 , 35 ]. In contrast, SiC porous ceramics with a hierarchically macroporous structure, as reported here, were obtained in a facile way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase of temperature to 2000 °C (Figure 4d), the strength of the samples is slightly reduced (102 MPa at 10% strain and 692 MPa at 49% strain); additionally, the stress-strain curve becomes smoother (the zigzag has disappeared), demonstrating Weibull distribution regarding the compressive strength of tested samples at a porosity range of 45-55%. c) Strength versus porosity of the 9HEB samples compared to the reported porous ceramics, such as SiC, [3,15,[30][31][32][33] mullite, [34][35][36][37][38] Si 3 N 4 -SiC, [39] Si 3 N 4 , [40] Al 2 O 3 , [41] SiO 2 , [42,43] ZrB 2 -SiC, [44,45] 𝛾-Y 2 Si 2 O 7 , [46,47] ZrC, [48,50] ZrC-SiC, [49] HfC, [50] AlN, [51] SiOC, [52] Anorthite, [53] and ZrO 2 -Al 2 O 3 . [8] d) In situ compressive stress-strain curves of the samples at elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b)Weibull distribution regarding the compressive strength of tested samples at a porosity range of 45-55%. c) Strength versus porosity of the 9HEB samples compared to the reported porous ceramics, such as SiC,[3,15,[30][31][32][33] mullite,[34][35][36][37][38] Si 3 N 4 -SiC,[39] Si 3 N 4 ,[40] Al 2 O 3 ,[41] SiO 2 ,[42,43] ZrB 2 -SiC,[44,45] 𝛾-Y 2 Si 2 O 7 ,[46,47] ZrC,[48,50] ZrC-SiC,[49] HfC,[50] AlN,[51] SiOC,[52] Anorthite,[53] and ZrO 2 -Al 2 O 3 [8]. d) In situ compressive stress-strain curves of the samples at elevated temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conductivity and cost of the products with Al 2 O 3 as the binder are higher . In comparison, mullite (3Al 2 O 3 ·2SiO 2 ), which is the only stable compound in the binary Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 system, possesses a relatively low thermal conductivity, excellent thermal shock resistance, high melting point, and good economic efficiency. Thus, mullite can be one potential candidate to prepare lamellas with good high temperature resistance and thermal stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%