1941
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(41)90149-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preparation of autogenous bone grafts with osteotomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1942
1942
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger bone graft requirements arise when the osseous defect is considerable, or the pathology necessitates enhanced osteosynthesis stimulus. Besides the fibula, the tibia as the supplementary donor offers several additional advantages: both sites can be harvested together; the tibia is subcutaneous anteromedially and easily assessed; the tibial cortical graft nearly matches its counterpart fibular graft length and strength; some medullary cancellous component is also available with the tibial graft [13,14,16]. Moreover, tibial regenerations are well documented in children [2,5,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Larger bone graft requirements arise when the osseous defect is considerable, or the pathology necessitates enhanced osteosynthesis stimulus. Besides the fibula, the tibia as the supplementary donor offers several additional advantages: both sites can be harvested together; the tibia is subcutaneous anteromedially and easily assessed; the tibial cortical graft nearly matches its counterpart fibular graft length and strength; some medullary cancellous component is also available with the tibial graft [13,14,16]. Moreover, tibial regenerations are well documented in children [2,5,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, several studies have reported donor site complications both in the short-and long-term after nonvascularized fibular grafts in children [8][9][10][11][12]. Contrarily, despite being in use for clinical practice for several decades, there is very limited literature on the subject of combined tibial and fibular harvesting [13][14][15]. Little is known about the donor site outcomes or morbidity following these dual harvests [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stuck 110 advocates removal of tibial grafts of the massive onlay type with an osteotome in preference to a motor saw. He states that the grafts removed in this manner have the advantage of raw irregular edges and are not devitalized by overheating.…”
Section: Roentgenologic and (3) Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%