“…One study was in Japanese and was excluded. 36 Twenty-two studies were subsequently excluded for specific reasons: 3 studies 34,35,37 had a study protocol not related to the objectives of this systematic review, 8 studies 14,[25][26][27]30,39,40,42 had absence of control group (non-diseased samples), one study 38 only presented disease samples from a single patient, 7 studies 28,29,[31][32][33]41,44 hadn't clearly defined inclusion and/or exclusion criteria, and finally 3 studies 43,45,46 were excluded because they only addressed opportunistic pathogens. Additional hand searching of the reference lists of the selected papers didn't retrieve any additional studies.…”