The Presence of Behavioral Traps in U.S. Airline Accidents: A Qualitative Analysis

Abstract

Behavioral traps are accident-inducing operational pitfalls aviators may encounter as a result of poor decision making. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) identifies the existence of twelve of these negative pilot behaviors. These are: Peer Pressure; Get-There-Itis; Loss of Situational Awareness; Descent Below the Minimum En Route Altitude (MEA); Mind Set; Duck-Under Syndrome; Getting Behind the Aircraft; Continuing Visual Flight Rules (VFR) into Instrument Conditions; Scud Running; Operating Without Adequate Fuel Reserves; Flying Outside the Envelope; and Neglect of Flight Planning, Preflight Inspections, and Checklists. The purpose of this paper was to study the nature of their occurrence in the airline domain. Four Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) analyzed 34 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) accident reports. The SMEs were able to identify many pilot actions that were representative of the behavioral traps. Behavioral traps were found in all accidents with Loss of Situational Awareness and Neglect of Flight Planning, Preflight Inspections, and Checklists dominant. Various themes began to emerge, which played important roles in many accidents. These themes included Crew Resource Management (CRM) issues, airline management and fatigue. The findings of this study indicated that behavioral traps were prevalent in airline accidents including habitual noncompliance by pilots. Attitude management training is recommended.

Difference in risk perception of onboard security threats by aircrew and aviation security experts

“…There have been several high-profile aviation accidents where a human factors phenomenon known by pilots as "Get-There-Itis" has played a role. This is when a pilot's judgment is impaired through a fixation on the original goal or destination, combined with a disregard for any alternative course of action (Velazquez, 2018). Because of this, all pilots have been trained to overcome "Get-There-Itis" for safety reasons.…”

Problems that Occur in a Team: Learning From Maritime Accidents via Simulation Training

“…However, group think, including direct pressure on dissenters (group members are under social pressure to not oppose the group consensus), self-censorship (doubts and deviations from the perceived group consensus are not accepted) and the illusion of unanimity may cause distortion of decision making, eventually triggering accidents (Murata et al, 2015). For example, poor decision-making based upon an emotional response to peers has been recognised as pilots´ behavioural trap (Velazquez, 2018). Similarly, the desire for harmony in a group manifested as reluctance to challenge the assessments and decisions made by their colleagues has been listed as a factor that do not receive sufficient attention during maritime accident investigations (Schroder-Hinrichs et al, 2012).…”

Electro-Encephalography and Electro-Oculography in Aeronautics: A Review Over the Last Decade (2010–2020)

“…A number of important studies have related eye movement analysis to fatigue, mental workload, and cognitive performance in pilots. One of the most important causes of aviation accidents is provoked by human errors e.g., drowsiness or fatigue (Velazquez, 2018 ). Pilot fatigue and loss of control are considered by the Federal Aviation Administration as one of four common aviation hazards (Federal Aviation Administration, “Risk Management Handbook: U.S. Department of Transportation,” 2016).…”