The Present and Future of Kuwaiti-Iranian Relations and Their Influence on the Security of the Arabian Gulf

Alsalloum, Khaled Abdulaziz; Tayie, Mohamed Salman

doi:10.5539/ass.v14n1p102

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This views the survival of the state (self-preservation and wellbeing) as the ultimate essence of the state, which must be protected by whatever means necessary (moral and, or immoral) (Navari, 2016;Zartman, 2019). In this sense, national interest connotes the pursuance of state's survival in terms of territorial integrity, security/defense, economic prosperity, and wellbeing, as well as the promotion of state values and ideology within the community of nations (Alsalloum & Tayie, 2018;Navari, 2016;Zartman, 2019).…”

Section: National Interest Vs Collective Security: a Synopsismentioning

confidence: 99%

National Interest and Collective Security: Assessing the ‘Collectivity’ of Global Security in the Covid-19 Era

Patrick

Khalema

Abiolu

et al. 2021

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: The study's rationale is tied to examining the viability of global collective security within a continuously changing arena of national interest of actors. It assesses the basis for global actors' policy responses and actions in the fight against the novel coronavirus (Covid-19). Methodology: The study uses a secondary data scoping review technique focusing on collective security, national interest, and Covid -19 as the central themes. It utilizes the tenents of human nature, cooperation, and systemic considerations espoused in game theory’s stag hunt analysis and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to explore the rationale for state actions in the global arena. Main findings: The paper confirms that while collective security is essential for global security, its efficacy is dependent on its alignment with states' national interests. Drawing from case observation of global superpowers' responses to Covid-19, the paper argues that the global and 'borderless' impact of Covid-19 serves to buttress the assertion that the integrity of collective security is a function of national interest alignment. In essence, collective security is only 'collective' and effective when state actors' national interests are directly aligned to the pursuance of such security objective(s). The paper concludes that the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic could only be won if global actors shun the narrow gains of national interest and focus on the survival of all through collective policy efforts. Application: The study is relevant as it adds to the body of knowledge and analysis for geopolitics and international relations. It is also a useful prototype in theory testing and analysis within politics and international relations subfields. It is also relevant in the discourse of global public health and human security. Novelty: The need to assess the methodology and need for collective action in the face of global threats is imperative. Thus, the study serves as an eye-opener and acknowledgment of the declining status of collective security in the face of national interest despite the clamor pre- and post-United nations formation and aim for world peace. Therefore, the global and 'borderless' impact of Covid-19 serves to buttress the assertion that the integrity of collective security is a function of national interest alignment. In essence, collective security is only 'collective' and effective when state actors' national interests are directly in agreement with the pursuance of such security objective(s).

show abstract