The Presidentialization of Political Parties
DOI: 10.1057/9781137482464.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Presidentialization of Parties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, the study challenges the cartel model's generalizing logic by emphasizing potential for ongoing inter-party differences. Notwithstanding few recent efforts (Gauja, 2017;Passarelli, 2015;Pedersen, 2010), studies have tended to emphasize general tendencies (Heidar and Saglie, 2003). The study acknowledges that instead of uniform adaptation and eventual convergence, parties may react differently to external pressures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretically, the study challenges the cartel model's generalizing logic by emphasizing potential for ongoing inter-party differences. Notwithstanding few recent efforts (Gauja, 2017;Passarelli, 2015;Pedersen, 2010), studies have tended to emphasize general tendencies (Heidar and Saglie, 2003). The study acknowledges that instead of uniform adaptation and eventual convergence, parties may react differently to external pressures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, a recent comprehensive study showed convincingly that in regard to PCO/PPO power balance, Danish parties' statutes did not change almost at all between the 1950s and the first decade of the 2000s, and instead they continued to reflect the parties' origins and ideologies (Pedersen, 2010). Recent qualitative research, too, has suggested that intra-party power balance might still vary across parties (Enroth and Hagevi, 2018;Passarelli, 2015). In the Swedish social democratic party, the PCO even appears to have strengthened since the 1960s (Loxbo, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that hostility toward the out-group can develop independently from -and drive support for -the in-group is indeed at the core of the social identity perspective on negative voting (Medeiros and Noël, 2014;Abramowitz and Webster, 2016;Bankert, 2020). In parallel, research on the personalization of politics (Poguntke and Webb 2005;Passarelli 2015;Elgie and Passarelli 2019;Garzia et al, 2020) finds that negative attitudes toward the political out-group concern not only political parties but can also spill over to individual candidates (Barisione, 2017). Accordingly, evaluations of (out-party) candidates have been shown to also act as determinants of the vote, acting alongside positive (in-party) candidate evaluations (Garzia and Ferreira da Silva, 2021a).…”
Section: The Decline Of Structural Determinants Of Electors' Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elgie also underscores the importance of David Samuels and Matthew Shugart's book (2010) in rebooting the research agenda in comparative politics. In particular, he emphasizesin agreement with Samuels and Shugartthat together with the institutions that are able to shape political party organization, 'party organization might be the "missing variable" in studies on the effect of regime types' (Elgie 2011: 408;Passarelli 2015Passarelli , 2020. In this way, Elgie connects the study of semi-presidentialism as a political and institutional regime with political parties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%