2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98369-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The presurgical controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is independently associated with severe peristomal skin disorders: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Abstract: While nutritional interventions may potentially lower the risk of peristomal skin disorders (PSDs) and their exacerbation, no previous studies have evaluated the relationship between PSDs and nutritional status using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of preoperative nutritional status on stoma health, and determine risk factors for postoperative PSDs, including severe PSDs. A retrospective analysis was performed of 116 consecutive patients with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated independently by two researchers using the risk of bias assessment tool provided in the Cochrane Handbook 6.0. The evaluation criteria were as follows: (1) generation of random sequences; (2) allocation concealment; (3) blinding of intervention providers and participants; (4) blinding of outcome assessors; (5) completeness of outcome data; (6) selective reporting of study results; and (7) other sources of bias. Each criterion was assessed as 'low risk of bias', 'unclear', or 'high risk of bias'.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated independently by two researchers using the risk of bias assessment tool provided in the Cochrane Handbook 6.0. The evaluation criteria were as follows: (1) generation of random sequences; (2) allocation concealment; (3) blinding of intervention providers and participants; (4) blinding of outcome assessors; (5) completeness of outcome data; (6) selective reporting of study results; and (7) other sources of bias. Each criterion was assessed as 'low risk of bias', 'unclear', or 'high risk of bias'.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the surgery effectively prolongs the life expectancy of patients with colorectal cancer, the stoma changes the original physiological function and body image of the patient. It often causes complications, such as stoma stricture, obstruction, and wound infection, which have a significant impact on the life of the patients and impose a heavy psychological burden 5,6 . To improve the postoperative quality of life of patients with stoma and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, they must continue to receive guidance and assistance from health care professionals after their discharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%