The prevalence and correlates of sitting in European adults - a comparison of 32 Eurobarometer-participating countries

Abstract

BackgroundProlonged sitting is an emerging health risk. However, multi-country comparative sitting data are sparse. This paper reports the prevalence and correlates of sitting time in 32 European countries.MethodsData from the Eurobarometer 64.3 study were used, which included nationally representative samples (n = 304-1,102) from 32 European countries. Face-to-face interviews were conducted during November and December 2005. Usual weekday sitting time was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short-version). Sitting time was compared by country, age, gender, years of education, general health status, usual activity and physical activity. Multivariable-adjusted analyses assessed the odds of belonging to the highest sitting quartile.ResultsData were available for 27,637 adults aged 15–98 years. Overall, mean reported weekday sitting time was 309 min/day (SD 184 min/day). There was a broad geographical pattern and some of the lowest amounts of daily sitting were reported in southern (Malta and Portugal means 194–236 min/day) and eastern (Romania and Hungary means 191–276 min/day) European countries; and some of the highest amounts of daily sitting were reported in northern European countries (Germany, Benelux and Scandinavian countries; means 407–335 min/day). Multivariable-adjusted analyses showed adults with low physical activity levels (OR = 5.10, CI95 = 4.60-5.66), those with high sitting in their main daily activity (OR = 2.99, CI95 = 2.74-3.25), those with a bad/very bad general health state (OR = 1.87, CI95 = 1.63-2.15) and higher education levels (OR = 1.48, CI95 = 1.38-1.59) were more likely to be in the highest quartile of daily sitting time. Adults within Greece (OR = 2.91, CI95 = 2.51-3.36) and Netherlands (OR = 2.56, CI95 = 2.22-2.94) were most likely to be in the highest quartile. High-sit/low-active participants comprised 10.1% of the sample. Adults self-reporting bad/very bad general health state (OR = 4.74, CI95 = 3.97-5.65), those within high sitting in their main daily activities (OR = 2.87, CI95 = 2.52-3.26) and adults aged ≥65 years (OR = 1.53, CI95 = 1.19-1.96) and were more likely to be in the high-sit/low-active group.ConclusionsWeekday sitting time and its demographic correlates varied considerably across European countries, with adults in north-western European countries sitting the most. Sitting is prevalent across Europe and merits attention by preventive interventions.

Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Low-Income Adults in Metropolitan Kuala Lumpur

“…40 Increasing sedentary behavior is strongly related to an increased risk of NCDs. 41 In this study, this prevalence is lower (32.9%) than that found worldwide (41.5%) 34 and for Argentina (52.8%), but it is more than that found for Brazil (28.2%) and Colombia (27.2%).…”

El sedentarismo se asocia a un incremento de factores de riesgo cardiovascular y metabólicos independiente de los niveles de actividad física

“…A nivel global, se estima que entre 55% y 70% de las actividades que se realizan diariamente (sin considerar el tiempo destinado a dormir) son de tipo sedentarias 1,[4][5][6] . A nivel nacional, los chilenos han experimentado cambios importantes en sus estilos de vida durante las últimas tres décadas, generando que actualmente 19,8% de la población sea físicamente inactiva 7 .…”

Health impacts of the M74 urban motorway extension: a mixed-method natural experimental study

“…[16][17][18] Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are particularly prevalent in more affluent countries; the UK data included in a recent global study suggest that 63% of the population is physically inactive, 19 and other data suggest that British adults sit for an average of 5.5 hours per day. 20 Recently, research and policy attention has been drawn to the potential of active travel (walking or cycling for transport) to contribute to daily physical activity and to promote good health. [21][22][23] Active travel can become a habitual, sustainable part of everyday life, as well as having important co-benefits such as helping to limit carbon emissions through reduced reliance on motorised transport.…”