2018
DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_85_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in selected primary care centers during the 3-year screening intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a higher prevalence of the disease, even higher than in Asian countries (28.0%; 95% CI: 24.0 to 33.0) [ 9 ]. This difference could be due to the fact that in Latin America and the Caribbean there is a high prevalence of risk factors for the development of diabetic retinopathy such as hypertension, obesity, cardiovascular disease and the intake of foods rich in sugar and fats [ 71 74 ], in addition to the lack of implementation of prevention strategies in comparison to more developed countries [ 75 ]. It should be taken into account that the certainty of the evidence of the prevalences in T1DM and T2DM is very low and could be overestimated by the number of studies in primary care centers and hospitals and by the bias effect of small populations, so that future studies with better methodological quality could modify our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found a higher prevalence of the disease, even higher than in Asian countries (28.0%; 95% CI: 24.0 to 33.0) [ 9 ]. This difference could be due to the fact that in Latin America and the Caribbean there is a high prevalence of risk factors for the development of diabetic retinopathy such as hypertension, obesity, cardiovascular disease and the intake of foods rich in sugar and fats [ 71 74 ], in addition to the lack of implementation of prevention strategies in comparison to more developed countries [ 75 ]. It should be taken into account that the certainty of the evidence of the prevalences in T1DM and T2DM is very low and could be overestimated by the number of studies in primary care centers and hospitals and by the bias effect of small populations, so that future studies with better methodological quality could modify our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, prediction of individual DR risk may become a key element. Currently, to the best of our knowledge, there are two methods of doing this: risk factor based, which is of limited predictive clinical utility,19 20 and that developed by Bora et al, 21 which uses both deep learning and risk factors for optimal results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some work has been done on finding risk factors for DR, using patient data such as age, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, gender, duration of disease, and the like,19 20 clinicians are traditionally unable to predict the development of DR in patients. However, a previous article published findings of AUC 0.79 using a machine learning algorithm to predict DR development over 2 years using fundus photography 21.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most harmful and common complications is diabetic retinopathy (DR) [2,3]. This is a leading cause of blindness worldwide [4], with 103.1 million adults affected by DR in 2020 and a predicted 160.5 million affected in 2045 [5]. Moreover, DR individuals often develop a visual impairment, leading to a poor quality of life for the patient and impacting on the health care system in terms of direct and indirect costs.…”
Section: Diabetic Retinopathy (Dr): An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%