Background
The plantar foot represents a sensory dynamometric map and is essential for balance and gait control. Sensory impairments are common, yet often difficult to quantify in neurological conditions, particularly stroke. A functionally oriented and quantifiable assessment, the Foot Roughness Discrimination Test (FoRDT), was developed to address these shortcomings.
Objective
To evaluate inter‐ and intrarater reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the FoRDT.
Design
Test‐retest design.
Setting
Hospital outpatient.
Participants
Thirty‐two people with stroke (mean age 70 years) at least 3 months after stroke, and 32 healthy, age‐matched controls (mean age 70).
Main Outcome Measures
Roughness discrimination thresholds were quantified utilizing acrylic foot plates, laser cut to produce graded spatial gratings. Stroke participants were tested on three occasions, and by two different raters. Inter‐ and intrarater reliability and agreement were evaluated with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Bland‐Altman plots. Convergent validity was evaluated through Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) between the FoRDT and the Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA).
Results
Intra‐ and interrater reliability and agreement were excellent (ICC =0.86 [95% CI 0.72‐0.92] and 0.90 [95% CI 0.76‐0.96]). Discriminant validity was demonstrated through significant differences in FoRDT between stroke and control participants (P < .001). Stroke fallers had statistically significant higher FoRDT scores compared with nonfallers (P = .01). Convergent validity was demonstrated through significant and strong correlations (rho) with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment (r = .69, P < .01). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis indicated the novel test to have excellent sensitivity and specificity in predicting the presence of self‐reported sensory impairments. Functional Reach test significantly correlated with FoRDT (r = .62, P < .01) whereas measures of postural sway and gait speed did not (r = .16‐.26, P > .05).
Conclusions
This simple and functionally oriented test of plantar sensation is reliable, valid, and clinically feasible for use in an ambulatory, chronic stroke and older population. It offers clinicians and researchers a sensitive and robust sensory measure and may further support the evaluation of rehabilitation targeting foot sensation.
Level of Evidence
III.