2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00110-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of alcohol, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines and stimulants amongst injured drivers and their role in driver culpability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
100
2
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
13
100
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, the high OR estimate obtained for sleepiness/ drowsiness supports the increasing importance given to this factor in recent years as an immediate cause of traffic crashes (33,(38)(39)(40). In addition, our results once again document the effect of alcohol consumption on the risk of being involved in a traffic crash (33,34,(41)(42)(43). The large increase in both crude and adjusted OR estimates for drivers with a positive breath test in comparison to drivers under the influence of alcohol but who did not take a breath test may reflect the joint effect of several factors: (a) information bias in the police officers' visual assessment of the drivers' sobriety (27), (b) other information bias if police officers tended to request a breath test only if they believed that the driver had committed an infraction in this crash (26), and (c) an approximately dose-dependent relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of causing a collision, assuming that police officers tended to request a breath test more frequently if the driver presented evident signs of inebriation.…”
Section: Factors Directly Related With Collisionssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In any case, the high OR estimate obtained for sleepiness/ drowsiness supports the increasing importance given to this factor in recent years as an immediate cause of traffic crashes (33,(38)(39)(40). In addition, our results once again document the effect of alcohol consumption on the risk of being involved in a traffic crash (33,34,(41)(42)(43). The large increase in both crude and adjusted OR estimates for drivers with a positive breath test in comparison to drivers under the influence of alcohol but who did not take a breath test may reflect the joint effect of several factors: (a) information bias in the police officers' visual assessment of the drivers' sobriety (27), (b) other information bias if police officers tended to request a breath test only if they believed that the driver had committed an infraction in this crash (26), and (c) an approximately dose-dependent relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of causing a collision, assuming that police officers tended to request a breath test more frequently if the driver presented evident signs of inebriation.…”
Section: Factors Directly Related With Collisionssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is aggravated by the fact that young people generally consume more alcohol and drugs than adults of more advanced age, and tend to exceed speed limits and ignore other traffic safety standards more, which increases the chances of accidents (8)(9) . In a study carried out in Londrina in the year 2000, it was verified that 65.6% of male young people had already been involved in traffic accidents, 15.6% had already participated in street races and 44.6% had consumed alcoholic beverages and driven a vehicle afterwards in the last 30 days (10) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesquisa foi realizada entre novembro de 2006 e abril de 2007 com 74 pacientes internados em um hospital de São Paulo. Foram predominantes indivíduos do sexo masculino (91,9%), média de idade de 31, 8 anos, brancos (51,3%), vítimas de acidentes de trabalho (51,4%). As fraturas de membros inferiores representaram 73,0% dos casos e membros superiores 13,5%.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Therefore, it is not possible to infer whether the incidence of drug use was higher among deceased drivers and motorcyclists compared with that of the general community [4]. Secondly, it should be noted that the presence of drugs in drivers does not necessarily mean that the drug was a causal factor in the MVC [26]. Indeed, some of the drugs detected in this study e.g., paracetamol, are not known to produce driving impairment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It should be noted that cannabis metabolites persist for some time in the body before they are eliminated, and can therefore be detected long after any psychological effect or impairment has disappeared [26]. In addition, financial and time constraints imposed on some studies may mean that cannabis testing is prioritized, leading to an apparent increase in prevalence [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%