2020
DOI: 10.4103/jodd.jodd_5_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of dental anomalies among the Maharashtrian population: A radiographic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of this study showed that hypodontia, with a prevalence of 36.5%, was the most common anomaly among dental number anomalies. These results are in accord with the findings of Yassin 2 and Kumar et al 15 and in contrast with those of Montasser and Taha 14 .…”
Section: Prevalence Of Supernumerary Anomalies In the Populationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result of this study showed that hypodontia, with a prevalence of 36.5%, was the most common anomaly among dental number anomalies. These results are in accord with the findings of Yassin 2 and Kumar et al 15 and in contrast with those of Montasser and Taha 14 .…”
Section: Prevalence Of Supernumerary Anomalies In the Populationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the studies conducted by Kumar et al 15 and Yassin 2 , hypodontia was the most common developmental anomaly (11.6% and 9.7%, respectively). In the study of Bilge et al 13 , among the observed cases of numeric dental anomalies, hypodontia was the most common subgroup (13.8%).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Supernumerary Anomalies In the Populationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence of dental anomalies was higher in patients under 20 years old compared with those over 20 years. (Kumar, 2020) A. Dilaceration of the roots was the most prevalent (16.48%) ( Figure 4) encountered followed by peg-shaped lateral incisors (7.41%) and congenitally missing teeth (4.07%). X-Axis represents tooth number with the Presence or Absence of dilacerated root and Y-axis represents no.…”
Section: Association Of Dilacerated Roots With Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haghanifar et al 9 (2019) e Fahim & ElAbbasy 10 (2020) relataram impactação em 15,2% dos casos, enquanto Fardi et al 8 (2011) apresentou em 13,7% dos casos. A prevalência mais baixa foi de 5,5% em uma população indiana 7 , enquanto a mais alta na população brasileira 31,52% 11 , essa discrepância pode ser explicada pelo tamanho da amostra e pela diferença geográfica das populações em estudo, enfatizando a relevância do fator genético e ambiental.…”
Section: I S C U S S ãOunclassified