2016
DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.2.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of foodborne pathogenic bacteria on cutting boards and their ecological correlation with background biota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In first step of the PCR technique, the genetic material is isolated and purified from the target samples [104]. The step can also be a culture-independent method; for example, [32,33] used the swabbing of cutting boards for sample collection. Further, they vortexed the samples to obtain microbes and then extracted DNA without culturing these samples.…”
Section: Molecular Biology Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In first step of the PCR technique, the genetic material is isolated and purified from the target samples [104]. The step can also be a culture-independent method; for example, [32,33] used the swabbing of cutting boards for sample collection. Further, they vortexed the samples to obtain microbes and then extracted DNA without culturing these samples.…”
Section: Molecular Biology Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyrosequencing analysis is one of the techniques used to study microbial communities in numerous samples such as abomasal ulcers [14], blood cultures [15], drinking water distribution systems [16], and refrigerators [17]. The present work is a continuation from Abdul-Mutalib et al [9,18] who also applied the same technique to study microbial communities on cutting boards collected from several food premises in Seri Kembangan, Malaysia. The results showed a high diversity of microorganisms present on the cutting board samples, including few species of foodborne pathogens such as Bacillus cereus, Salmonella spp., Chronobacter and E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some recent studies reflect that dirty conditions or low-grade food premises do not necessarily harm consumers because of the protective effect of indigenous microbiota, which can help reduce the growth of pathogens through antagonistic effects, including direct and indirect competition for nutrients, competition for physical attachment sites, and production of antimicrobial compounds. This is the case for Clostridiales, Flavobacteriales, Enterobacteriales and Lactobacillales, which have been reported to interact to ensure survival and impair the growth of pathogenic bacteria [34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%