2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of malnutrition and its effects on the all-cause mortality among patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Objective Malnutrition has a high occurrence in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The prevalence of malnutrition and its impact on all-cause mortality in patients with CHF were assessed using a meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and VIP databases were searched to collect cross-sectional and cohort studies on malnutrition, and the prevalence and all-cause mortality of patients with CHF were determined. The time of retrieval w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 The MNA‐SF, GNRI, and CONUT scores are representative nutritional screening methods that have been validated in several studies in HF patients. 4 , 5 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 The present study suggests that the MNA‐SF score is the most appropriate first choice for nutritional screening of HF patients because it had the highest diagnostic performance for the assessment of nutritional status in accordance with the GLIM criteria in our study ( Figure 3 ). One possible reason for the inferiority of the GNRI and CONUT scores is that these indicators are only assessed by objective measures such as blood tests or BMI at a single point and do not include temporal or subjective nutritional information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 15 The MNA‐SF, GNRI, and CONUT scores are representative nutritional screening methods that have been validated in several studies in HF patients. 4 , 5 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 The present study suggests that the MNA‐SF score is the most appropriate first choice for nutritional screening of HF patients because it had the highest diagnostic performance for the assessment of nutritional status in accordance with the GLIM criteria in our study ( Figure 3 ). One possible reason for the inferiority of the GNRI and CONUT scores is that these indicators are only assessed by objective measures such as blood tests or BMI at a single point and do not include temporal or subjective nutritional information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…These nutritional indicators are representative nutritional screening methods that have been validated in several studies in HF patients. 4 , 5 , 7 , 9 , 10 The MNA‐SF is a simple nutritional screening tool, consisting of six questionnaire items. The MNA‐SF score ranges from 0 to 14 points, and patients with a score of 12 or less were defined as at nutritional risk, as previously described.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite advances in medicine, heart failure (HF) remains an increasing public health problem associated with high morbidity and mortality 1 . Malnutrition has been reported as common and associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with HF 2 . Objective nutritional assessments have been recommended in patients with HF, such as the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score 3 – 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is triggered by poor nutritional intake, malabsorption, systemic inflammation, neurohumoral activation, oxidative stress, and augmented catabolic process (4)(5)(6)(7). Malnutrition in heart failure is associated with higher hospital readmission rates and increased mortality rates (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Obese individuals with heart failure were paradoxically associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes and survival, which is referred to as the obesity paradox.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%