The Prevalence of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in the Korean Military Compared with the General Population

Abstract

BackgroundObesity and related metabolic disorders are growing health challenges worldwide and individuals at military service are not exceptions. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS) in the Korean military and to compare with the general population.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 4,803 young military participants who underwent a corporal health-screening program between October 2013 and October 2014. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria was used to identify MS. We also sampled 1,108 men aged 19–29 years from the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey from 2010 to 2013 to compare with their military counterparts.ResultsThe mean age of military participants was 20.8 ± 1.1 years, and 20.6% (n = 988) were obese. The prevalence of MS was 0.8% in military participants, while 7.9% in general population. The risk factors of MS were less prominent among military participants relative to civilians, with the exception of high blood pressure, of which prevalence was higher among military participants (21.5% vs. 18.2%, respectively). In multiple logistic analysis, high physical activity conferred lower odds of MS and obesity in military participants (odds ratios, 0.19 and 0.81, respectively). Age older than 25 years increased risk of most components of MS among civilians.ConclusionThe prevalence of obesity and MS is lower in military participants compared with civilians of similar age. Monitoring of high blood pressure and proper stress management are warranted in those at military service.

Prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors for coronary artery disease and elevated fibrinogen among active military personnel in Republic of Serbia: A cross-sectional study

“…Besides blood pressure, both body mass and BMI index gradually increased with the age of the patients, so that the highest values were in the oldest group. Thus, our results are in accordance with the previous study considering trend, but the prevalence is a little higher, probably thanks to the specific nutrition habits and sedentary way of life among our study group (26)(27).…”

“…The prevalence of dyslipidemia among military personnel in the literature was from 5.3% to 41.96%. The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C are respectively: between 3.12% and 5.2%, 3.9% and 28%, 31% [14] [15] [21] [26] [27] [31] . In accordance with cited studies were our results considering all lipid fractions gradual increments with age.…”

Recent Trends of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components in Military Recruits from Saudi Arabia

“…Military personnel are considered healthy and physically fit adults who may be at low risk for developing a cardio-metabolic disease, as military service requires adherence to body composition, fitness and medical standards [42]. However, evidence suggests that biomarkers and health-risk behaviours associated with Met-S in military personnel may be similar to that observed in civilians [38,43,44]. Compared to previous reports [45], military recruits are now less physically fit and are larger, with elevated body fat, highlighting the necessity for regular surveys, monitoring and effective primary prevention strategies.…”

The role of cardiovascular CT in occupational health assessment for coronary heart disease: An expert consensus document from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT)

“…[20][21][22][23] In the military, like the general population, the most frequent cause of death is CAD, with an increasing trend seen with increasing age. [24][25][26] Whilst recruiting at a younger age, a focus on physical fitness, 27,28 reduced obesity levels [29][30][31] and the early discharge of those with conditions known to predispose to CVD, such as diabetes, 29,31 chronic kidney disease or rheumatoid arthritis, may reduce the burden of CVD, 32,33 a higher proportion of males recruited from lower socioeconomic groups, increased rates of smoking 31,[34][35][36] and a paradoxical increased rate of cardiovascular events due to vigorous exertion may not only negate any benefits, but worsen cardiovascular health in comparison to the comparative normal population. 37 The "healthy worker effect" does not apply to either firefighters or commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.…”